From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E2CA00C5; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 11:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BFB1BF9E; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 11:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com (mail-wm1-f68.google.com [209.85.128.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C551BF93 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 11:49:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id v8so13536442wma.0 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 02:49:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=N+Y06gZQ84PHEoDhhmCgHiYmlJ//rerrmTnQxlNiUWg=; b=ee0Y95Xo6LHWf9OODDch2FQYhh7cukUk1Jhfi7yhgwDSewnEWW5b8rIh7puayfW7JY zmTTnTd48fFxyhkAp9/Imlxb29v3MQmPQsOUDb5WU1mB6uty6ERtpYHsUlVuqn1hsS4C 98jV/Jp+rz1ioV/pRfLETGx8yoDXkNfUzZvFfy/RyhPLSyKj9x/jtdzxeR1Ehq30EFwH vX67aaCOZNc/q+Rpx0tGNDfb9dkbwljiImt9jBvCLoDJ1F9EGDJj3IxxS8FOT1uOG5OS Layv1p/lQRStKZElcz0j80H7WirhFVUnPWr6A6e+SsaprH/mxfY5EQfcL6ck6bpH+7UB Obaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaMfSWbda4JUEtkBfX6YpB9shm0AdiXWK1q+LiAcFGwP7hzlDwh nUTHNZJ2CQxnh6+lViBLtOk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLa8ofyilTvdRgMQtbYmHT6Q+UtB+82AoZ5h3s9gR5uBYMrLwPxXH7W2jG8zjyOmRKrhYPLQw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7706:: with SMTP id t6mr20320007wmi.110.1587894554899; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 02:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:4b00:f419:6f00:e2db:6a88:4676:d01b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x13sm11380345wmc.5.2020.04.26.02.49.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 26 Apr 2020 02:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Luca Boccassi To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Kevin Traynor , dev@dpdk.org Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 10:49:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4740923.upeRZZJTqa@thomas> References: <20200229163706.12741-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <83712900-431c-87e9-f9bd-5853ef796c21@redhat.com> <49933ebf7b872aefa7686fb227470200401e6ed5.camel@debian.org> <4740923.upeRZZJTqa@thomas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Fix various typos found by Lintian X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 19:47 +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 04/03/2020 16:28, Luca Boccassi: > > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 14:34 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote: > > > On 29/02/2020 16:37, luca.boccassi@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Debian's linter is getting more and more annoy^^smart and now > > > > parses binaries > > > > for typos too - CC stable to get it off my back in the next > > > > release > > >=20 > > > Minor: Probably linter is better trained in the Queen's English > > > than > > > me > > > or it could be personal preference, but 'one' seems to be > > > referring > > > to > > > the user and it reads a bit strange for me. e.g. > > >=20 > > > "Slave %d capabilities doesn't allow one to allocate additional > > > queues" > > > "hardware specifications that allow one to handle virtual memory" > > > "Do not allow one to send packet if the maximum DMA.." > > >=20 > > > as opposed to > > >=20 > > > "Slave %d capabilities don't allow allocation of additional > > > queues" > > > "hardware specifications that allow handling of virtual memory" > > > "Do not allow sending of a packet if the maximum DMA.." > >=20 > > You might be right - but the intent here is not to be correct, it's > > to > > get the linter to leave me alone :-) >=20 > I agree with Kevin that the wording "allow one to make" is strange. > Would lintian leave you alone with "allow making"? >=20 > Anyway the "allow to" sentences are not typos. > They could be reworded in a separate patch. >=20 > Patch partly applied, except the "allow one to" changes, thanks. It probably would work - will check in the next cycle. --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi