From: Moses Young <mosesyyoung@gmail.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Yang Ming <ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal/linux: skip vfio for non-privileged container
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 15:55:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd5e0cf1-9428-41a7-89f7-8fecbb3cf2d3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e76aaa6-09c3-4721-afbb-aeb3bc9a42e2@intel.com>
On 5/16/2025 9:30 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 3/27/2025 8:57 AM, Yang Ming wrote:
>> DPDK detect vfio container according the existence of vfio
>> module. But for container with non-privileged mode, there is
>> possibility that no VFIO_DIR(/dev/vfio) mapping from host to
>> container when host have both Intel NIC and Mellanox NIC but
>> this conntainer only allocate VFs from Mellanox NIC.
>> In this case, vfio kernel module has already been loaded from
>> the host.
>> This scenario will cause the error log occurs in DPDK primary
>> process as below:
>> 'EAL: cannot open VFIO container, error 2 (No such file or
>> directory)'
>> 'EAL: VFIO support could not be initialized'
>> Because `rte_vfio_enable()` call `rte_vfio_get_container_fd()`
>> to execute `vfio_container_fd = open(VFIO_CONTAINER_PATH,
>> O_RDWR);` but VFIO_CONTAINER_PATH(/dev/vfio/vfio) doesn't exist
>> in this container.
>> This scenario will also lead to the delay of DPDK secondary
>> process because `default_vfio_cfg->vfio_enabled = 0` and
>> `default_vfio_cfg->vfio_container_fd = -1`, socket error will
>> be set in DPDK primary process when it sync this info to
>> the secondary process.
>> This patch use to skip this kind of useless detection for this
>> scenario.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Ming <ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com>
>
> With a few code grammar fixes below,
>
> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
>
>> ---
>> lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c
>> index 7132e24cba..1679d29263 100644
>> --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c
>> +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> #include <unistd.h>
>> #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>> +#include <dirent.h>
>> #include <rte_errno.h>
>> #include <rte_log.h>
>> @@ -1083,6 +1084,7 @@ rte_vfio_enable(const char *modname)
>> /* initialize group list */
>> int i, j;
>> int vfio_available;
>> + DIR *dir;
>> const struct internal_config *internal_conf =
>> eal_get_internal_configuration();
>> @@ -1119,6 +1121,15 @@ rte_vfio_enable(const char *modname)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> + /* return 0 if VFIO directory not exist for container with
>> non-privileged mode */
>
> /* VFIO directory might not exist (e.g. unprivileged containers) */
>
>> + dir = opendir(VFIO_DIR);
>> + if (dir == NULL) {
>> + EAL_LOG(DEBUG,
>
> "VFIO directory does not exist, skipping VFIO support..."
>
>> + "VFIO directory not exist, skipping VFIO support...");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + closedir(dir);
>> +
>> if (internal_conf->process_type == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
>> if (vfio_mp_sync_setup() == -1) {
>> default_vfio_cfg->vfio_container_fd = -1;
>
>
Hi Anatoly,
Thank you for your review and the suggested improvements.
I will apply the code grammar fixes you mentioned soon in next version:
1. Updated the comment to:
/* VFIO directory might not exist (e.g., unprivileged containers) */
2. Modified the log message to:
"VFIO directory does not exist, skipping VFIO support..."
These changes enhance clarity and align with the coding standards. I
appreciate your attention to detail.
Best regards,
Yang Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-17 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 7:28 [PATCH] Skip vfio in the scenario of non-privileged mode Yang Ming
2025-01-17 16:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-22 8:15 ` Yang Ming
2025-02-26 3:10 ` Yang Ming
2025-02-26 13:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-28 5:23 ` Yang Ming
2025-03-27 7:57 ` [PATCH v2] eal/linux: skip vfio for non-privileged container Yang Ming
2025-05-16 6:46 ` David Marchand
2025-05-16 11:08 ` Moses Young
2025-05-16 13:30 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-17 7:55 ` Moses Young [this message]
2025-05-17 8:15 ` [PATCH] Skip vfio in the scenario of non-privileged mode Yang Ming
2025-05-17 8:21 ` [PATCH v3] " Yang Ming
2025-05-17 8:32 ` [PATCH v4] eal/linux: skip vfio for non-privileged container Yang Ming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd5e0cf1-9428-41a7-89f7-8fecbb3cf2d3@gmail.com \
--to=mosesyyoung@gmail.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).