From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org,
seanbh@gmail.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio-user: fix memory hotplug support in vhost-kernel
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:18:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cee8bdc3-b013-a477-0ba1-dd40b4495f2d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180910040441.GB23854@debian>
On 10-Sep-18 5:04 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:24:05PM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>> On 07-Sep-18 12:37 PM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 10:44:22AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>>>> On 05-Sep-18 5:28 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
>>>>> It's possible to have much more hugepage backed memory regions
>>>>> than what vhost-kernel supports due to the memory hotplug, which
>>>>> may cause problems. A better solution is to have the virtio-user
>>>>> pass all the memory ranges reserved by DPDK to vhost-kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 12ecb2f63b12 ("net/virtio-user: support memory hotplug")
>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c | 38 +++++++++----------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c
>>>>> index 897fee0af..9338166d9 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c
>>>>> @@ -70,41 +70,41 @@ static uint64_t vhost_req_user_to_kernel[] = {
>>>>> [VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE] = VHOST_SET_MEM_TABLE,
>>>>> };
>>>>> -struct walk_arg {
>>>>> - struct vhost_memory_kernel *vm;
>>>>> - uint32_t region_nr;
>>>>> -};
>>>>> static int
>>>>> -add_memory_region(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl __rte_unused,
>>>>> - const struct rte_memseg *ms, size_t len, void *arg)
>>>>> +add_memseg_list(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl, void *arg)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - struct walk_arg *wa = arg;
>>>>> + struct vhost_memory_kernel *vm = arg;
>>>>> struct vhost_memory_region *mr;
>>>>> void *start_addr;
>>>>> + uint64_t len;
>>>>> - if (wa->region_nr >= max_regions)
>>>>> + if (vm->nregions >= max_regions)
>>>>> return -1;
>>>>> - mr = &wa->vm->regions[wa->region_nr++];
>>>>> - start_addr = ms->addr;
>>>>> + start_addr = msl->base_va;
>>>>> + len = msl->page_sz * msl->memseg_arr.len;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mr = &vm->regions[vm->nregions++];
>>>>> mr->guest_phys_addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)start_addr;
>>>>> mr->userspace_addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)start_addr;
>>>>> mr->memory_size = len;
>>>>> - mr->mmap_offset = 0;
>>>>> + mr->mmap_offset = 0; /* flags_padding */
>>>>> +
>>>>> + PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "index=%u addr=%p len=%" PRIu64,
>>>>> + vm->nregions - 1, start_addr, len);
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> -/* By default, vhost kernel module allows 64 regions, but DPDK allows
>>>>> - * 256 segments. As a relief, below function merges those virtually
>>>>> - * adjacent memsegs into one region.
>>>>> +/* By default, vhost kernel module allows 64 regions, but DPDK may
>>>>> + * have much more memory regions. Below function will treat each
>>>>> + * contiguous memory space reserved by DPDK as one region.
>>>>> */
>>>>> static struct vhost_memory_kernel *
>>>>> prepare_vhost_memory_kernel(void)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct vhost_memory_kernel *vm;
>>>>> - struct walk_arg wa;
>>>>> vm = malloc(sizeof(struct vhost_memory_kernel) +
>>>>> max_regions *
>>>>> @@ -112,20 +112,18 @@ prepare_vhost_memory_kernel(void)
>>>>> if (!vm)
>>>>> return NULL;
>>>>> - wa.region_nr = 0;
>>>>> - wa.vm = vm;
>>>>> + vm->nregions = 0;
>>>>> + vm->padding = 0;
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * The memory lock has already been taken by memory subsystem
>>>>> * or virtio_user_start_device().
>>>>> */
>>>>> - if (rte_memseg_contig_walk_thread_unsafe(add_memory_region, &wa) < 0) {
>>>>> + if (rte_memseg_list_walk_thread_unsafe(add_memseg_list, vm) < 0) {
>>>>> free(vm);
>>>>> return NULL;
>>>>> }
>>>>> - vm->nregions = wa.region_nr;
>>>>> - vm->padding = 0;
>>>>> return vm;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't that assume single file segments mode?
>>>
>>> This is to find out the VA ranges reserved by memory subsystem.
>>> Why does it need to assume single file segments mode?
>>
>> If you are not in single-file segments mode, each individual page in a
>> VA-contiguous area will be behind a different fd - so it will be part of a
>> different region, would it not?
>
> Above code is for vhost-kernel. Kernel doesn't need the
> fds to get the access to virtio-user process's memory.
> Kernel just needs to know the mappings between GPA (guest
> physical address) and VA (virtio-user's virtual address).
>
Ah OK. Thanks for clarification!
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-17 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-05 4:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Some fixes/improvements for virtio-user memory table Tiwei Bie
2018-09-05 4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/virtio-user: fix deadlock in memory events callback Tiwei Bie
2018-09-05 8:10 ` Sean Harte
2018-09-07 9:30 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-11 12:52 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-09-05 4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/virtio-user: avoid parsing process mappings Tiwei Bie
2018-09-07 9:39 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-07 11:35 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-07 12:21 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-10 3:59 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-17 10:17 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-17 11:57 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-17 13:06 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-11 12:58 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-09-05 4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio-user: fix memory hotplug support in vhost-kernel Tiwei Bie
2018-09-07 9:44 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-07 11:37 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-07 12:24 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-10 4:04 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-17 10:18 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2018-09-11 13:10 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-09-11 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Some fixes/improvements for virtio-user memory table Maxime Coquelin
2018-09-20 7:35 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cee8bdc3-b013-a477-0ba1-dd40b4495f2d@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=seanbh@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).