From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA3F5F0D for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 13:21:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 May 2019 04:21:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from aburakov-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.27]) ([10.237.220.27]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2019 04:21:36 -0700 To: Amin Saba , dev@dpdk.org References: From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 12:21:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI for FreeBSD. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 11:21:40 -0000 On 14-May-19 11:27 AM, Amin Saba wrote: > Hi all, > > Are there any specific issues in FreeBSD that have prevented implementation > of KNI? > > Is implementation of KNI for FreeBSD in your roadmap? > > Thanks in adv, > Amin > Hi, I am not aware of KNI for FreeBSD being on a roadmap. I also don't think anyone looked at it in any serious way as to figure out if there are specific issues that prevent KNI from working on FreeBSD. -- Thanks, Anatoly From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF80AA00E6 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 13:21:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067DB5F19; Tue, 14 May 2019 13:21:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA3F5F0D for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 13:21:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 May 2019 04:21:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from aburakov-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.27]) ([10.237.220.27]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2019 04:21:36 -0700 To: Amin Saba , dev@dpdk.org References: From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 12:21:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI for FreeBSD. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190514112135.nHUO6l2TqJViJ-EnPVBrlA3kqb4Q8Hqr0uuoE3AcVrE@z> On 14-May-19 11:27 AM, Amin Saba wrote: > Hi all, > > Are there any specific issues in FreeBSD that have prevented implementation > of KNI? > > Is implementation of KNI for FreeBSD in your roadmap? > > Thanks in adv, > Amin > Hi, I am not aware of KNI for FreeBSD being on a roadmap. I also don't think anyone looked at it in any serious way as to figure out if there are specific issues that prevent KNI from working on FreeBSD. -- Thanks, Anatoly