From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7623A04B5; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:45:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09161BFCD; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:45:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CB61B9B7 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:45:48 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: 8hhxm60mxqOJFFTIlEflLtHUvQmha1oErJ2xeRjlpmTi1pSe7TQ7k7G/OrcoBelKeurP+XMhgb 4vCxKSvQS1Vg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9740"; a="146423219" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,415,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="146423219" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2020 03:45:46 -0700 IronPort-SDR: /6w7KaixHaQHy+d1WB78+gq9qzsRwEOHS8G/SRjpwb7Eh8Qu2qTEx246t9/HjzoCAEHi+jNLJ3 QYpaXRrD9K+g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,415,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="378530179" Received: from fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.82]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2020 03:45:45 -0700 Received: from shsmsx604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) by fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 03:45:44 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:45:43 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:45:42 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Guo, Jia" , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Xing, Beilei" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , Xu , "Xu, HailinX" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2] net/iavf: fix invalid cmd after pf reset Thread-Index: AQHWiCU5oN+vczwEz0epdoGA8l7Kt6ljQPaA Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:45:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20200911052114.62723-1-jia.guo@intel.com> <20200911101848.111384-1-jia.guo@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200911101848.111384-1-jia.guo@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.108.32.68] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/iavf: fix invalid cmd after pf reset X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Guo, Jia > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 6:19 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing ; Zhang, Qi Z ; > Xing, Beilei > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Guo, Jia ; Xu; Xu, HailinX > > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/iavf: fix invalid cmd after pf reset >=20 > If PF reset is finished but VF reset is pending, VF should no need to sen= d any > invalid cmd to PF. That would avoid mass unexpected behaviors affecting t= he > robust. >=20 > Fixes: 22b123a36d07 ("net/avf: initialize PMD") > Fixes: 9e03acd726cf ("net/iavf: fix flow access") >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo > Tested-by: Xu, HailinX Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi