From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE344551D;
	Fri, 28 Jun 2024 06:07:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50DD427E5;
	Fri, 28 Jun 2024 06:07:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341504029B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 06:07:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.48])
 by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4W9MKp50HJzdfLk;
 Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:05:34 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemm600004.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.193.23.242])
 by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A2E180087;
 Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:07:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.67.121.59] (10.67.121.59) by kwepemm600004.china.huawei.com
 (7.193.23.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 28 Jun
 2024 12:07:08 +0800
Message-ID: <d3799b6f-503e-7e46-8a73-d2e2d1906ad1@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:07:08 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.2.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] power: introduce PM QoS API on CPU wide
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
CC: <dev@dpdk.org>, <mb@smartsharesystems.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>,
 <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>, <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, <david.hunt@intel.com>,
 <sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com>, <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
 <liuyonglong@huawei.com>
References: <20240320105529.5626-1-lihuisong@huawei.com>
 <20240627060011.17816-1-lihuisong@huawei.com>
 <20240627060011.17816-2-lihuisong@huawei.com>
 <20240627080651.57f898c8@hermes.local>
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240627080651.57f898c8@hermes.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.67.121.59]
X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To
 kwepemm600004.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.242)
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org


在 2024/6/27 23:06, Stephen Hemminger 写道:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:00:10 +0800
> Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> +	char buf[BUFSIZ] = {0};
> BUFSIZ is 4K and you probably don't need all of that.
I rember the maximum buffer length of sysfs show in Linux is BUFSIZ.
Just from the same size, here is ok to receive the data from Linux.
But LINE_MAX is also enough to use.
> And initializing to 0 here should not be needed.
Ack
>
> Why not:
> 	char buf[LINE_MAX];
Thanks for your suggestion. use it in next version.
>> +	if (latency == 0)
>> +		sprintf(buf, "%s", "n/a");
>> +	else if (latency == RTE_POWER_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_NO_CONSTRAINT)
>> +		sprintf(buf, "%u", 0);
>> +	else
>> +		sprintf(buf, "%u", latency);
> Use snprintf instead.
Ack
> .