DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bluca@debian.org, david.marchand@redhat.com,
	ian.stokes@intel.com, Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] build/pkg-config: remove machine arch flag
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:23:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d508695b-9017-5f80-8c3b-54f7fff75db7@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUIfNSZ6jjL5p1pH@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>



On 9/15/21 9:28 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:51:11PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>> Traditionally any apps built using DPDK had to support the same
>> instruction sets as supported when the DPDK SDK itself was built, since
>> that was "leaked" through to the end-app and DPDK headers via
>> RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_* values. Therefore, when converting over to meson
>> for app build correctness the "-march=" flag was included in the
>> pkg-config cflags output.
>>
>> However, since the DPDK-specific CPU flags are now obsolete, and we
>> instead check directly for compiler-defined flags, we should no longer
>> need to force the exact same architecture match in all cases. To
>> faciliate such flexibility, a new pkg_config_machine_args array - which
>> defaults to the existing machine_args array has been defined. The
>> individual architectures - x86, arm and ppc - can choose if and how to
>> override this value themselves.
>>
>> For x86, since SSE4.2 is the minimum instruction-set level needed to run
>> DPDK, and since some header files assume that minimum level of
>> instruction set support, we override the "-march=" value with "-msse4"
>> for the pkg-config file. This allows end applications to set their own
>> "march" value while still ensuring valid DPDK compilation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> CC: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
>> CC: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
>> CC: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
>> CC: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> for 
>> Feedback requested from ARM and PPC maintainers as to this change
>> and what flags, if any, need to be in the .pc file for DPDK on such
>> platforms. For example - is setting 'pkg_config_machine_args' to
>> 'machine_args' by default necessary behaviour?
>>
> 
> Ping for further thoughts or input on this patch.

On initial inspection I don't see any additional value for PPC systems. 
  Selection of a CPU through -mcpu implies a full ISA for that CPU, 
including things like vector extensions, at least with respect to the 
minimum supported POWER8 CPU (ISA 2.07) and later ISAs.  The values of 
machine_args and pkg_config_machine_args should be identical in all 
cases I can think of.

If a third party OpenPOWER CPU comes along some time in the future then 
the requirements may change.

Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-15 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-11 15:51 Bruce Richardson
2020-12-16 18:45 ` David Christensen
2021-09-15 16:28 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-15 21:23   ` David Christensen [this message]
2021-09-16  3:43     ` Jerin Jacob
2021-09-16 10:16       ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-09-16 14:11         ` Ruifeng Wang
2023-06-14 19:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-06-15  8:44   ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d508695b-9017-5f80-8c3b-54f7fff75db7@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).