From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6B832A5 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:51:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 457DC81254; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ktraynor.remote.csb (vpn1-6-80.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.80]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uB7Cpr35018789; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 07:51:53 -0500 To: Maxime Coquelin , yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, zhiyong.yang@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org References: <20161206122440.12039-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> From: Kevin Traynor Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:51:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161206122440.12039-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: introduce PVP reference benchmark X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:51:56 -0000 On 12/06/2016 12:24 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > Having reference benchmarks is important in order to obtain > reproducible performance figures. > > This patch describes required steps to configure a PVP setup > using testpmd in both host and guest. > > Not relying on external vSwitch ease integration in a CI loop by > not being impacted by DPDK API changes. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin > --- > > Thanks to all the reviewers, this v2 should take all remarks into account. > > -- Maxime Acked-by: Kevin Traynor