From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Amit Gupta <agupta3@marvell.com>,
"Gobriel, Sameh" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/meson: hash test split into shorter subtests
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:37:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dadc86ee-fdc8-60cd-c956-ceec59659553@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D2C4A16CA39F7F4E8E384D204491D7A673F283D8@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
On 11/1/2019 5:04 PM, Wang, Yipeng1 wrote:
> Hi, Amit,
>
> I think I acked this patch. But from patchwork seems you superseded this patch set accidentally. So Thomas might have missed it.
> To make his life easier, you may submit a newer version with my acked. I believe Thomas will see it.
cc'ed David.
Hi Amit,
The patch is in "Superseded" state as Yipeng said, as far as I understand that
is not the case, I am updating their status as "New". Can you please confirm
this is the correct state?
>
> Thanks
> Yipeng
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Amit Gupta [mailto:agupta3@marvell.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 9:54 PM
>> To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
>> <jerinj@marvell.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] test/meson: hash test split into shorter subtests
>>
>> Ping!
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Amit Gupta
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 10:33 AM
>>> To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh
>>> <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
>>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>>> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] test/meson: hash test split into shorter subtests
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 10:35 PM
>>>> To: Amit Gupta <agupta3@marvell.com>; Gobriel, Sameh
>>>> <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
>>>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>>>> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH 1/2] test/meson: hash test split into
>>>> shorter subtests
>>>>
>>>> External Email
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: agupta3@marvell.com [mailto:agupta3@marvell.com]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 10:50 PM
>>>>> To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh
>>>>> <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
>>>>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
>>>>> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Amit Gupta <agupta3@marvell.com>
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] test/meson: hash test split into shorter
>>>>> subtests
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Amit Gupta <agupta3@marvell.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> hash_readwrite meson test was taking longer time to complete.
>>>>> The test always get TIMEOUT, hence test is split into functional and
>>>>> perf test. perf test is being moved under dpdk perf testsuites in
>>>>> meson build.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Gupta <agupta3@marvell.com>
>>>> [Wang, Yipeng]
>>>> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the patch!
>>>
>>> @Wang, Yipeng1, any plan on taking this patch ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-05 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 5:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] test/meson: fix hash readwrite timeout failure agupta3
2019-09-06 5:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/meson: hash test split into shorter subtests agupta3
2019-09-11 17:05 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-10-17 5:02 ` Amit Gupta
2019-11-01 4:54 ` Amit Gupta
2019-11-01 17:04 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-11-05 16:37 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-11-07 3:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Amit Gupta
2019-12-31 4:56 ` Amit Gupta
2019-09-06 5:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/meson: hash lf test moved to dpdk perf testsuite agupta3
2019-09-11 17:13 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-09-12 15:00 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-13 8:24 ` Amit Gupta
2019-09-13 8:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] " agupta3
2019-09-13 14:40 ` Aaron Conole
2019-09-13 15:09 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-09-13 15:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-16 4:39 ` Amit Gupta
2019-10-17 4:57 ` Amit Gupta
2019-10-17 13:16 ` Aaron Conole
2019-10-24 7:22 ` David Marchand
2019-09-13 8:15 ` agupta3
2019-09-11 5:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] test/meson: fix hash readwrite timeout failure Amit Gupta
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] test/meson: hash test split into shorter subtests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] test/hash: remove duplicated test code Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 8:48 ` David Marchand
2020-02-05 16:42 ` David Marchand
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] test/hash: add lock free reader writer functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 9:07 ` David Marchand
2020-02-05 16:22 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 16:41 ` David Marchand
2020-02-05 19:34 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2020-02-05 19:52 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 19:57 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] test/hash: move reader writer lock free tests to perf tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] hash: correct lock free extendable table support Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] test/meson: fix hash readwrite timeout failure David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dadc86ee-fdc8-60cd-c956-ceec59659553@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=agupta3@marvell.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).