DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Kumara Parameshwaran <kparameshwar@vmware.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix to populate fds in secondary process
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:35:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <db6faa3e-e38e-8862-9286-a763fe609c79@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220124121251.64762-1-kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>

On 1/24/2022 12:12 PM, Kumara Parameshwaran wrote:
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran <kparameshwar@vmware.com>
> 
> When a tap device is hotplugged to primary process which in turn
> adds the device to all secondary process, the secondary process
> does a tap_mp_attach_queues, but the fds are not populated in
> the primary during the probe they are populated during the queue_setup,
> added a fix to sync the queues during rte_eth_dev_start
> 
> Fixes: 4852aa8f6e21 ("drivers/net: enable hotplug on secondary process")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kumara Parameshwaran <kparameshwar@vmware.com>
> ---
> 
> v2:
> * Addressed review comments to move the function declaration and version
>    map
> 

Thanks for adding patch version.

>   drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 196 +++++++++++++---------------------
>   lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h    |  17 +++
>   lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c       |  11 ++
>   lib/ethdev/version.map        |   2 +
>   4 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
> 

Can you please separate etdev (API) changes to another patch, so this will be a patchset
with two patches,
first patch adds ethdev API
second patch is tap patch, that uses the API in the first patch

> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> index f1b48cae82..f6c25d7e21 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
>   	(TAP_GSO_MBUFS_PER_CORE * TAP_GSO_MBUF_CACHE_SIZE)
>   
>   /* IPC key for queue fds sync */
> -#define TAP_MP_KEY "tap_mp_sync_queues"
> +#define TAP_MP_REQ_START_RXTX "tap_mp_req_start_rxtx"
> 

We said we can drop "tap_mp_sync_queues", but thinking twice,
will current implementation cover following usecase:

- Primary applicaiton started with tap interface, all config, setup,
   start done
- Secondary app started without any parameter

Since primary already started, I think secondary fds will be wrong,
what do you think?

>   #define TAP_IOV_DEFAULT_MAX 1024
>   
> @@ -880,11 +880,48 @@ tap_link_set_up(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>   	return tap_ioctl(pmd, SIOCSIFFLAGS, &ifr, 1, LOCAL_AND_REMOTE);
>   }
>   
> +static int tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)

Can you please follow the coding convention:

static int
tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
{

> +{
> +	struct rte_mp_msg msg;
> +	struct ipc_queues *request_param = (struct ipc_queues *)msg.param;
> +	int err;
> +	int fd_iterator = 0;
> +	struct pmd_process_private *process_private = dev->process_private;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
> +	strlcpy(msg.name, TAP_MP_REQ_START_RXTX, sizeof(msg.name));
> +	strlcpy(request_param->port_name, dev->data->name, sizeof(request_param->port_name));
> +	msg.len_param = sizeof(*request_param);
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> +		msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->txq_fds[i];
> +		msg.num_fds++;
> +		request_param->txq_count++;
> +	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> +		msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->rxq_fds[i];
> +		msg.num_fds++;
> +		request_param->rxq_count++;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
> +	if (err < 0) {
> +		TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to send start req to secondary %d",
> +			rte_errno);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int
>   tap_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>   {
>   	int err, i;
>   
> +	if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
> +		tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(dev);
> +
>   	err = tap_intr_handle_set(dev, 1);
>   	if (err)
>   		return err;
> @@ -901,6 +938,34 @@ tap_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> +static int
> +tap_mp_req_start_rxtx(const struct rte_mp_msg *request, __rte_unused const void *peer)
> +{

I asked last time but I don't remember the response,
what should be in the 'peer' variable?

> +	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> +	const struct ipc_queues *request_param =
> +		(const struct ipc_queues *)request->param;
> +	int fd_iterator;
> +	int queue;
> +	struct pmd_process_private *process_private;
> +
> +	dev = rte_get_eth_dev_by_name(request_param->port_name);
> +	if (!dev) {
> +		TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to get dev for %s",
> +			request_param->port_name);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	process_private = dev->process_private;
> +	fd_iterator = 0;
> +	TAP_LOG(DEBUG, "tap_attach rx_q:%d tx_q:%d\n", request_param->rxq_count,
> +		request_param->txq_count);
> +	for (queue = 0; queue < request_param->txq_count; queue++)
> +		process_private->txq_fds[queue] = request->fds[fd_iterator++];
> +	for (queue = 0; queue < request_param->rxq_count; queue++)
> +		process_private->rxq_fds[queue] = request->fds[fd_iterator++];
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   /* This function gets called when the current port gets stopped.
>    */
>   static int
> @@ -1084,6 +1149,7 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>   
>   	if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
>   		rte_free(dev->process_private);
> +		rte_mp_action_unregister(TAP_MP_REQ_START_RXTX);
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -1140,8 +1206,6 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>   		internals->ioctl_sock = -1;
>   	}
>   	rte_free(dev->process_private);
> -	if (tap_devices_count == 1)
> -		rte_mp_action_unregister(TAP_MP_KEY);
>   	tap_devices_count--;
>   	/*
>   	 * Since TUN device has no more opened file descriptors
> @@ -2292,113 +2356,6 @@ rte_pmd_tun_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -/* Request queue file descriptors from secondary to primary. */
> -static int
> -tap_mp_attach_queues(const char *port_name, struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> -{
> -	int ret;
> -	struct timespec timeout = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0};
> -	struct rte_mp_msg request, *reply;
> -	struct rte_mp_reply replies;
> -	struct ipc_queues *request_param = (struct ipc_queues *)request.param;
> -	struct ipc_queues *reply_param;
> -	struct pmd_process_private *process_private = dev->process_private;
> -	int queue, fd_iterator;
> -
> -	/* Prepare the request */
> -	memset(&request, 0, sizeof(request));
> -	strlcpy(request.name, TAP_MP_KEY, sizeof(request.name));
> -	strlcpy(request_param->port_name, port_name,
> -		sizeof(request_param->port_name));
> -	request.len_param = sizeof(*request_param);
> -	/* Send request and receive reply */
> -	ret = rte_mp_request_sync(&request, &replies, &timeout);
> -	if (ret < 0 || replies.nb_received != 1) {
> -		TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to request queues from primary: %d",
> -			rte_errno);
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -	reply = &replies.msgs[0];
> -	reply_param = (struct ipc_queues *)reply->param;
> -	TAP_LOG(DEBUG, "Received IPC reply for %s", reply_param->port_name);
> -
> -	/* Attach the queues from received file descriptors */
> -	if (reply_param->rxq_count + reply_param->txq_count != reply->num_fds) {
> -		TAP_LOG(ERR, "Unexpected number of fds received");
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -
> -	dev->data->nb_rx_queues = reply_param->rxq_count;
> -	dev->data->nb_tx_queues = reply_param->txq_count;
> -	fd_iterator = 0;
> -	for (queue = 0; queue < reply_param->rxq_count; queue++)
> -		process_private->rxq_fds[queue] = reply->fds[fd_iterator++];
> -	for (queue = 0; queue < reply_param->txq_count; queue++)
> -		process_private->txq_fds[queue] = reply->fds[fd_iterator++];
> -	free(reply);
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/* Send the queue file descriptors from the primary process to secondary. */
> -static int
> -tap_mp_sync_queues(const struct rte_mp_msg *request, const void *peer)
> -{
> -	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> -	struct pmd_process_private *process_private;
> -	struct rte_mp_msg reply;
> -	const struct ipc_queues *request_param =
> -		(const struct ipc_queues *)request->param;
> -	struct ipc_queues *reply_param =
> -		(struct ipc_queues *)reply.param;
> -	uint16_t port_id;
> -	int queue;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	/* Get requested port */
> -	TAP_LOG(DEBUG, "Received IPC request for %s", request_param->port_name);
> -	ret = rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(request_param->port_name, &port_id);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to get port id for %s",
> -			request_param->port_name);
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -	dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> -	process_private = dev->process_private;
> -
> -	/* Fill file descriptors for all queues */
> -	reply.num_fds = 0;
> -	reply_param->rxq_count = 0;
> -	if (dev->data->nb_rx_queues + dev->data->nb_tx_queues >
> -			RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM){
> -		TAP_LOG(ERR, "Number of rx/tx queues exceeds max number of fds");
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -
> -	for (queue = 0; queue < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; queue++) {
> -		reply.fds[reply.num_fds++] = process_private->rxq_fds[queue];
> -		reply_param->rxq_count++;
> -	}
> -	RTE_ASSERT(reply_param->rxq_count == dev->data->nb_rx_queues);
> -
> -	reply_param->txq_count = 0;
> -	for (queue = 0; queue < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; queue++) {
> -		reply.fds[reply.num_fds++] = process_private->txq_fds[queue];
> -		reply_param->txq_count++;
> -	}
> -	RTE_ASSERT(reply_param->txq_count == dev->data->nb_tx_queues);
> -
> -	/* Send reply */
> -	strlcpy(reply.name, request->name, sizeof(reply.name));
> -	strlcpy(reply_param->port_name, request_param->port_name,
> -		sizeof(reply_param->port_name));
> -	reply.len_param = sizeof(*reply_param);
> -	if (rte_mp_reply(&reply, peer) < 0) {
> -		TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to reply an IPC request to sync queues");
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>   /* Open a TAP interface device.
>    */
>   static int
> @@ -2442,9 +2399,11 @@ rte_pmd_tap_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
>   			return -1;
>   		}
>   
> -		ret = tap_mp_attach_queues(name, eth_dev);
> -		if (ret != 0)
> -			return -1;
> +		ret = rte_mp_action_register(TAP_MP_REQ_START_RXTX, tap_mp_req_start_rxtx);
> +		if (ret < 0 && rte_errno != ENOTSUP)
> +			TAP_LOG(ERR, "tap: Failed to register IPC callback: %s",
> +				strerror(rte_errno));
> +
>   		rte_eth_dev_probing_finish(eth_dev);
>   		return 0;
>   	}
> @@ -2492,15 +2451,6 @@ rte_pmd_tap_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
>   
>   	TAP_LOG(DEBUG, "Initializing pmd_tap for %s", name);
>   
> -	/* Register IPC feed callback */
> -	if (!tap_devices_count) {
> -		ret = rte_mp_action_register(TAP_MP_KEY, tap_mp_sync_queues);
> -		if (ret < 0 && rte_errno != ENOTSUP) {
> -			TAP_LOG(ERR, "tap: Failed to register IPC callback: %s",
> -				strerror(rte_errno));
> -			goto leave;
> -		}
> -	}
>   	tap_devices_count++;
>   	tap_devices_count_increased = 1;
>   	ret = eth_dev_tap_create(dev, tap_name, remote_iface, &user_mac,
> @@ -2511,8 +2461,6 @@ rte_pmd_tap_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
>   		TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to create pmd for %s as %s",
>   			name, tap_name);
>   		if (tap_devices_count_increased == 1) {
> -			if (tap_devices_count == 1)
> -				rte_mp_action_unregister(TAP_MP_KEY);
>   			tap_devices_count--;
>   		}
>   	}
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
> index d95605a355..a08991bcdf 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
> @@ -1629,6 +1629,23 @@ rte_eth_hairpin_queue_peer_bind(uint16_t cur_port, uint16_t cur_queue,
>   				struct rte_hairpin_peer_info *peer_info,
>   				uint32_t direction);
>   
> +/**

Please add '@internal' tag into doxygen comment.

> +* Get rte_eth_dev from device name. The device name should be specified
> +* as below:
> +* - PCIe address (Domain:Bus:Device.Function), for example- 0000:2:00.0
> +* - SoC device name, for example- fsl-gmac0
> +* - vdev dpdk name, for example- net_[pcap0|null0|tap0]
> +*
> +* @param name
> +*  pci address or name of the device
> +* @return
> +*   - rte_eth_dev if successful
> +*   - NULL on failure
> +*/
> +__rte_internal
> +struct rte_eth_dev*
> +rte_get_eth_dev_by_name(const char *name);

As the API name, better to start with 'rte_eth_' prefix to be consistent with
rest of the APIs.
I suggest 'rte_eth_dev_get_by_name' but feel free to chose better one.

> +
>   /**
>    * @internal
>    * Reset the current queue state and configuration to disconnect (unbind) it
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> index a1d475a292..9192b0d664 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -894,6 +894,17 @@ rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(const char *name, uint16_t *port_id)
>   	return -ENODEV;
>   }
>   
> +struct rte_eth_dev *
> +rte_get_eth_dev_by_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +	uint16_t pid;
> +
> +	if (rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(name, &pid))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return &rte_eth_devices[pid];
> +}
> +
>   static int
>   eth_err(uint16_t port_id, int ret)
>   {
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/version.map b/lib/ethdev/version.map
> index c2fb0669a4..7e3797189b 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/version.map
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/version.map
> @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>   	rte_flow_flex_item_create;
>   	rte_flow_flex_item_release;
>   	rte_flow_pick_transfer_proxy;
> +

This is unintendent change.

>   };
>   
>   INTERNAL {
> @@ -282,4 +283,5 @@ INTERNAL {
>   	rte_eth_representor_id_get;
>   	rte_eth_switch_domain_alloc;
>   	rte_eth_switch_domain_free;
> +	rte_get_eth_dev_by_name;

Please add in a sorted way.

>   };


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-24 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21  4:29 [PATCH] net/tap: Bug " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-24  9:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-24 12:12 ` [PATCH v2] net/tap: " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-24 12:35   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2022-01-24 12:48     ` Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-24 12:54     ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-01-24 13:05       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-28  9:55     ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-01-28 12:55       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-24 12:37 ` Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-24 13:06   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-31 14:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: define a function to get eth dev structure Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-31 14:21   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net/tap: fix to populate fds in secondary process Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-31 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: define a function to get eth dev structure Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-31 14:32   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net/tap: fix to populate fds in secondary process Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-02-01 16:57     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-01 16:56   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: define a function to get eth dev structure Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-01 17:12     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-01 17:15     ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=db6faa3e-e38e-8862-9286-a763fe609c79@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=kparameshwar@vmware.com \
    --cc=kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).