From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111AC1B2AE for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 00:03:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Nov 2017 15:03:09 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,411,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="3001017" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.69.63]) ([10.255.69.63]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2017 15:03:09 -0800 To: Mohammad Abdul Awal , dev@dpdk.org Cc: Remy Horton , Declan Doherty References: <1510929733-7225-1-git-send-email-mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com> <1510929733-7225-2-git-send-email-mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:03:09 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1510929733-7225-2-git-send-email-mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] lib/representor: port representor library to manage broker infrastructure and representor PMDs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 23:03:11 -0000 On 11/17/2017 6:42 AM, Mohammad Abdul Awal wrote: > diff --git a/lib/librte_representor/rte_port_representor_version.map b/lib/librte_representor/rte_port_representor_version.map > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..09ed768 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/lib/librte_representor/rte_port_representor_version.map > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +DPDK_18.02 {2 { > + global: > + > + rte_representor_broker_find; > + rte_representor_broker_init; > + rte_representor_broker_uninit; > + rte_representor_port_get_vport_id; > + rte_representor_port_register; > + rte_representor_port_unregister; Is any of these APIs intended to be used by application? >>From rest of the patch it looks like these are used by PMDs, if so why creating a new library? > + > + local: *; > +};