DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Michał Krawczyk" <mk@semihalf.com>,
	"Marcin Wojtas" <mw@semihalf.com>,
	"Tzalik, Guy" <gtzalik@amazon.com>,
	"Evgeny Schemeilin" <evgenys@amazon.com>,
	"Igor Chauskin" <igorch@amazon.com>,
	"Andrew Rybchenko" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix rte_memcpy build on ppc with gcc 9.3
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 13:28:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbe1ed1f-c217-e7aa-2b9c-e64cbf799ec6@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8yVo0_KL6W0=Xhjp8f+thg0WLpooM4uHbFRJq1nt5a0yQ@mail.gmail.com>


>> The rte_altivec.h is related to another open patch required to build on
>> POWER systems (http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69605/) that's waiting to
>> be accepted.  You may not have encountered it if you're not building the
>> MLX5 PMD which has additional library requirements.
> 
> Is there a point in having two patches?

The address different problems.  This patch addresses a build issue with 
gcc in Ubuntu 20.04, the other patch is related to the new trace library 
that uses boolean values from stdbool.h (or the use of the --std=c11 
build option) that causes a build error on POWER systems because of 
altivec definitions.

Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-05 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-04 17:45 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " David Christensen
2020-05-04 21:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " David Christensen
2020-05-05 10:33   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-05 16:32     ` David Christensen
2020-05-05 16:41       ` David Marchand
2020-05-05 20:28         ` David Christensen [this message]
2020-05-06  9:35           ` David Marchand
2020-05-06 15:59             ` David Christensen
2020-05-05 18:42       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-05 20:37         ` David Christensen
2020-05-06  9:23           ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-06 16:13   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbe1ed1f-c217-e7aa-2b9c-e64cbf799ec6@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=evgenys@amazon.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=gtzalik@amazon.com \
    --cc=igorch@amazon.com \
    --cc=mk@semihalf.com \
    --cc=mw@semihalf.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).