From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66971DE3; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 12:37:30 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2018 03:37:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,435,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="180635327" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.62]) ([10.237.221.62]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2018 03:37:28 -0800 To: Alejandro Lucero , dev@dpdk.org Cc: stable@dpdk.org References: <1519298028-30853-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 11:37:27 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1519298028-30853-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/nfp: add port id to mbuf X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 11:37:31 -0000 On 2/22/2018 11:13 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > Although this can be done by the app, because other PMDs are doing it, > apps expect this behaviour from the PMD. Although it doesn't explicitly stated, I think expectation is PMD to set it, the sample applications I checked in the dpdk don't set this. And it can give better performance setting in PMD where the data is hot. Fixes: b812daadad0d ("nfp: add Rx and Tx") Cc: stable@dpdk.org > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.