From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8FEA0A02; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF56161F1C; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:27:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDF6161F17 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:27:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FLNVF5Lf6zjZtZ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:25:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.103.128] (10.67.103.128) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:27:12 +0800 To: Thomas Monjalon CC: , , , References: <1618366270-1862-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> <1819606.apKz1G5DgA@thomas> From: "Min Hu (Connor)" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:27:12 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1819606.apKz1G5DgA@thomas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.128] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/45] add eal clean up to the example X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" ÔÚ 2021/4/14 16:23, Thomas Monjalon дµÀ: > 14/04/2021 04:10, Min Hu (Connor): >> According to the programming guide, the rte_eal_init should be used pairs >> with rte_eal_cleanup. >> >> This set of patches add eal clean up to the examples. > > Thank you > >> Chengchang Tang (45): > > It can be a single patch for all examples. > Well, merge to a single patch in v2, please check it, thanks. > > . >