From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AF569C6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  1 Feb 2017 16:42:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b65so44790847wmf.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 07:42:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent
 :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=51D3ZlHtjWf9HiRixKFq/32IQfeS0XkbvZeQ8pE294c=;
 b=QLSugsu/BgGQtd1s+pRv5uE67+efDznomWHvvyLldVH8eiss5QsDSIH2YttsqTRNtX
 4LdbsEAzROPlOPi6HInCTiPTtK6q4WddMEaUBrp11vBmIuJ/mVSDactnL9mo0I4up2to
 +iXS6bDPE2hy4KPWjhU6GJGXiYrNjRxWIN2LLYaYdNT2l76/FPJ2GIgpmnfEtKop9Bo5
 7gvTZNFln0TaBZkvqVZ86NAOkK67BCcGR4q+nQ653Smj1hPStx6ZzCH0ruFMFzkz1TLF
 v6bShpoOvm5tf7a+PxeIzJ0ak2VYVTKoVS9EKF0hx5a/7m2gTwlVbDMyONTWMvMlfrrd
 z/lg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=51D3ZlHtjWf9HiRixKFq/32IQfeS0XkbvZeQ8pE294c=;
 b=pxXS7J6LJbdDwmwoDVfQiQ6X2h9QxWk4H+85eEh9ssirdjmu7tmIH0pvoG6Vz69AUo
 YIGYkIp+7F6he482/2aJDpEifAnAd/uRCyuze+AVIOmPjG15sWT0vwhStutNGS5kxOz3
 t+T50gZAd/Zs+hUTD605nBmtwDrstUexsdKt8J6yClmxzaWVEnTSiFUMxbt3UtW5Q941
 Uxw/wi+2ym973yJR2Tn2LVteFjkKbBWn4bxS3F1L20Wj32n5HVxuxWk2q7g5Q+teVt7u
 wTxVP6Ao78RxfEX9uiKM9HHAoUtIFPROL9XZWZFJGiF7bS7Tn/hUgFeBsST+Lkmz7oIs
 FfCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJDQjy6EgiJqBZUNjXwyG0LrGzDo6xfhtljqLl0reSYeQIS6OFB+VK+oGErjOp3MYzQ
X-Received: by 10.28.143.204 with SMTP id r195mr3472312wmd.32.1485963740484;
 Wed, 01 Feb 2017 07:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.16.0.184] (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com.
 [62.23.145.78])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u198sm30205397wmf.9.2017.02.01.07.42.19
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 01 Feb 2017 07:42:19 -0800 (PST)
To: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
References: <1485855778-15496-1-git-send-email-pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
 <abf0d961-4b2a-e1bf-0732-cc9d933f9278@intel.com>
 <39a46c11-66c4-d8ed-a2bc-d9421cb4afd0@6wind.com>
 <ec2ade7b-282c-e882-8f2d-68c4f058ce1d@intel.com>
 <fcde07c9-44a5-deba-fede-de929e1fff62@6wind.com>
 <9fa2c783-349c-e20c-0e57-0c24e67a4683@intel.com>
 <9C574760-33CF-4163-94D4-A0C919F4592C@intel.com>
 <e1b5c4ec-7609-5a40-311a-61087ad2cad9@6wind.com>
 <74B7FC24-638D-4A48-A02D-C80B5B4E7E2B@intel.com>
 <78727e66-3588-79ab-6448-9858c19e2361@6wind.com>
 <A3752D28-D41D-47F0-9560-2DC190138478@intel.com>
 <8a13261b-215c-e294-1f61-b57e5ea998eb@6wind.com>
 <C74A55BC-4176-4CE7-9CF5-1343E371B567@intel.com>
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
From: Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <e6ab132f-7c01-a723-eb41-670c9c20aacc@6wind.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:40:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C74A55BC-4176-4CE7-9CF5-1343E371B567@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] net/tap: use correct tap name
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 15:42:21 -0000

On 02/01/2017 04:25 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>> On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:11 AM, Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/01/2017 12:29 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 01/31/2017 05:06 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:>
>>>>> Looking at the changes to set the link up/down and the adding the two functions. I noticed in the stop/start routines I was set the link in DPDK and not adjusting the interface link. Should the stop/start routine also do the same thing?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, my patch is probably wrong.
>>>> The best option would probably be to set dev->data->dev_link.link_status
>>>> appropriately inside tap_link_set() only.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure it's compulsory to actually set the link UP in tap_dev_start()
>>>> (respectively DOWN in tap_dev_stop()).
>>>> If it is, however, it would be best done using tap_link_set() in those
>>>> functions.
>>>
>>> I was setting the link up/down in both places in the old code. The gotta is link up/down came later (I guess) and applications only call start/stop. In the other drivers like ring the like they tend to set link in start/stop and in link up/down, which is what I patterned my driver on.
>>>
>>> I looked around and the only applications calling link up/down was testpmd and ip_pipeline, but all of the apps call start/stop. Even the docs to not suggest that link up/down be used it appears start/stop must set the Link state and the developer can call link up/down APIs if needed for others reasons.
>>>
>>> I assume the link up/down only effects the link state and the start/stop is creating/destroying resources.
>>>
>>> My only solution I guess is to add the link up/down code to the start/stop API.
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand your conclusion.
>> If the apps usually call start/stop only, then definitely those functions should set the link state appropriately.
>> To that effect, I think it best to just call tap_link_set() in tap_dev_start() (and similar for stopping).
>> Apps with just start/stop functions would get the expected behavior, and the tap PMD would also support setting the link up/down independently, for testpmd and ip_pipeline for example.
>>
>> Does that sound fine?
>
> Yes, this was what I was trying to say and calling tap_link_set() in tap_dev_start() is the solution.

Great, that looks good to me!

Regards,
Pascal