From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29A9A04A2; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:18:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BA21BF5D; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:18:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB671BF1B for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:18:24 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2019 07:18:23 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,271,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="224562906" Received: from aburakov-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.92]) ([10.237.220.92]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2019 07:18:21 -0800 To: Rajesh Ravi Cc: Ajit Khaparde , dev@dpdk.org, Jonathan Richardson , Scott Branden , Vikram Mysore Prakash , Srinath Mannam References: <20191015053047.52260-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> <83009bb3-1e0c-a22e-eff8-41a437817cb7@intel.com> <64edebee-3686-beca-2b30-c6ec1f26c162@intel.com> <31bff5b7-169c-e158-3a87-6448272c571c@intel.com> <32f3cd1a-08bb-e4bc-c22c-53453b936dd3@intel.com> <3a954a3f-1fc5-47f0-64f2-a7c8e3fbf964@intel.com> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:18:21 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add option --iso-cmem for external custom memory X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 05-Nov-19 2:10 PM, Rajesh Ravi wrote: > Thanks a lot Anatoly. > Will the same solution work with  DPDK 19.02 as well? We 're actually > using DPDK 19.02 for memory allocations for SPDK 19.07. > DPDK 19.11 may not be supported by SPDK 19.07 we 're currently using. > > I 'll definitely test if the patch works with DPDK 19.02 > > Thanks again for your time and help. > > Regards, > Rajesh Hi Rajesh, Please test the patch [1] and see if it works for you. The patch is not intended for 19.02 (in fact, 19.02 is not even supported any more), but it may still apply. In the meantime, i'm working on a different patch for 18.11, that will achieve the same thing using different means. [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62468/ -- Thanks, Anatoly