DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: huawei.xie@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: fix off-by-one error on nr_desc check
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:28:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea20be96-5f4b-6260-fc5f-153c8a94071b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160725152412.GS28708@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>



On 07/25/2016 05:24 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> nr_desc is not an index but the number of descriptors,
>> so can be equal to the virtqueue size.
>>
>> Fixes: a436f53ebfeb ("vhost: avoid dead loop chain")
>>
>> Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks for catching it!
>
>> ---
>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>
>> I faced the bug while testing my indirect descriptor patch, it happens
>> as soon as the number of chained descritors is above 2.
>>
>> But the bug may in theory also be faced with normal descriptors,
>
> In theory, yes, and only in one case, that there is a Tx has 256
> descriptors chained. If that happens, I doubt things work well.
> So I would say it just happens __in theory__.
Right.

>
>> so it might
>> be good to have it 16.07?
>
> Even though, it apparently fixes a bug, so I think we could have it
> for 16.07.
Good, but don't delay 16.07 for that! :)

>
> Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
>
> 	--yliu
>

Thanks,
Maxime

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-25 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-25 14:09 Maxime Coquelin
2016-07-25 15:24 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-25 15:28   ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2016-07-25 15:47   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ea20be96-5f4b-6260-fc5f-153c8a94071b@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).