DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
	mingshan.zhang@intel.com, arun.joshi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] bbdev: reduce warning level for one scenario
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 05:54:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb024192-469b-bfe3-be3d-3abe354e028e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1631063741-28631-7-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com>


On 9/7/21 6:15 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> Queue setup may genuinely fail when adding incremental queues
> for a given priority level. In that case application would
> attempt to configure a queue at a different priority level.
> Not an actual error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> ---
>   lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c | 7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c
> index fc37236..defddcf 100644
> --- a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c
> +++ b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c
> @@ -528,9 +528,10 @@ struct rte_bbdev *
>   	ret = dev->dev_ops->queue_setup(dev, queue_id, (conf != NULL) ?
>   			conf : &dev_info.default_queue_conf);
>   	if (ret < 0) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> -				"Device %u queue %u setup failed", dev_id,
> -				queue_id);
> +		/* This may happen when trying different priority levels */
> +		rte_bbdev_log(INFO,
> +				"Device %u queue %u setup failed",
> +				dev_id, queue_id);

This change is just changing the log level, which is fine.

I am looking at how the error handling is done for the function.

It seems like the bailing is done in the middle of change the queue state.

ex/ the block above this one

/* Release existing queue ... */

Does this leave the queue in a bad state ?

Tom

>   		return ret;
>   	}
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-12 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-08  1:15 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] bbdev update related to CRC usage Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] bbdev: add capability for CRC16 check Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:35   ` Tom Rix
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] baseband/turbo_sw: add support for CRC16 Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:38   ` Tom Rix
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] bbdev: add capability for 4G CB CRC DROP Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:39   ` Tom Rix
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G CRC drop Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:42   ` Tom Rix
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] doc: clarification of usage of HARQ in bbdev doc Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:44   ` Tom Rix
2021-10-11 20:29     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-11 20:33       ` Chautru, Nicolas
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] bbdev: reduce warning level for one scenario Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:54   ` Tom Rix [this message]
2021-09-13 17:03     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2021-09-13 20:01       ` Tom Rix
2021-10-04 23:40         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2021-10-05 10:05           ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb024192-469b-bfe3-be3d-3abe354e028e@redhat.com \
    --to=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=arun.joshi@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingshan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).