From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7F1A04B6; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:06:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F221D713; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:06:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288D21D449 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:06:13 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: EJUVr82N1HY1OoiY4kHRuo7WLCVrOxCq4zaXRUsk0RAwizMJJcGY78l5/cLMripnIF/JbkPemv kAR95AIF8nyQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9751"; a="222190173" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,290,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="222190173" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Sep 2020 06:06:12 -0700 IronPort-SDR: rCX/NG/zzN3IQFI2Z3vVTdYKMtLojpqZQADkm9xjkbTCqqXbtonO13u+oIp9jW53iY7fXpXdpi 5BzWk7Kehmrw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,290,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="510554095" Received: from fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.84]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2020 06:06:11 -0700 Received: from shsmsx603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) by fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:06:10 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:06:08 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:06:08 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Guo, Jia" , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Xing, Beilei" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4] net/iavf: support gtpu outer and inner co-exist Thread-Index: AQHWjX+GtvQt5WISgUygZgKhUGKSHql0pyfw Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:06:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20200909082031.28299-1-jia.guo@intel.com> <20200918054656.94560-1-jia.guo@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200918054656.94560-1-jia.guo@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/iavf: support gtpu outer and inner co-exist X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Guo, Jia > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 1:47 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing ; Zhang, Qi Z ; > Xing, Beilei > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Guo, Jia > Subject: [PATCH v4] net/iavf: support gtpu outer and inner co-exist >=20 > Although currently only the gtpu inner hash be enabled while not the gtpu= outer > hash, but the outer protocol still needed to co-exist with inner protocol= when > configure the gtpu inner hash rule, that would allow the gtpu innner hash > support for the different outer protocols. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi