From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C3248B2A; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 05:47:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F0A402AA; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 05:47:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from cstnet.cn (smtp21.cstnet.cn [159.226.251.21]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C459402A1 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 05:47:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.50.193] (unknown [42.177.188.84]) by APP-01 (Coremail) with SMTP id qwCowAC3UNDmqBppfe0CAQ--.15757S3; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:47:35 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:47:34 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] riscv: implement accelerated crc using zbc To: Stanislaw Kardach , dev@dpdk.org, Punit Agrawal , Liang Ma , Pengcheng Wang , Chunsong Feng References: <20240712154645.80622-1-daniel.gregory@bytedance.com> <20240827153230.52880-1-daniel.gregory@bytedance.com> <20240917142600.GA474015@ste-uk-lab-gw> Content-Language: en-US From: sunyuechi In-Reply-To: <20240917142600.GA474015@ste-uk-lab-gw> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: qwCowAC3UNDmqBppfe0CAQ--.15757S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUYO7k0a2IF6w1UM7kC6x804xWl14x267AK xVW8JVW5JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGw A2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r4j 6ryUM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Cr 1j6rxdM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv 0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z2 80aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI 7VAKI48JMxAqzxv26xkF7I0En4kS14v26r126r1DMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI 8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AK xVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI 8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280 aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43 ZEXa7IU8489tUUUUU== X-Originating-IP: [42.177.188.84] X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vxq53phfkxq5lvft2wodfhubq/1tbiDAUJAmkagzqHswAAs8 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 9/17/24 10:26 PM, Daniel Gregory wrote: > Would it be possible to get a review on this patchset? I would be happy > to hear any feedback on the approach to RISC-V extension detection or > how I have implemented the hardware-optimised CRCs. > Hi, Just wanted to follow up on this patch. Are you still interested in moving it forward? If so, could you please address the remaining comments([Patch 1/5] ...) and resolve the merge conflicts?