From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: "Minggang(Gavin) Li" <gavinl@nvidia.com>,
Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
"NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [V1] app/testpmd: restore VXLAN-GPE support
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed8facda-9a13-4d84-8771-845bab4895f8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IA1PR12MB6019C727E1E89147B8FC70BBB3A82@IA1PR12MB6019.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On 7/22/2024 8:10 AM, Minggang(Gavin) Li wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2024 4:25 AM
>> To: Minggang(Gavin) Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>;
>> Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; NBU-
>> Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas@monjalon.net>; Aman Singh
>> <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
>> Subject: Re: [V1] app/testpmd: restore VXLAN-GPE support
>>
>> On 7/17/2024 8:11 AM, Gavin Li wrote:
>>> VXLAN-GPE support was removed from testpmd recently. Drivers which are
>>> not migrated are still using VXLAN-GPE in tests.
>>>
>>> This commit is to restore the support for VXLAN-GPE in testpmd.
>>>
>>> Fixes: da118115d95c ("app/testpmd: support matching any VXLAN field")
>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>
>> Hi Gavin,
>>
>> The original patch was from you, right? What went wrong?
> The remove of VXLAN-GPE from testpmd is too aggressive since there are
> drivers which are not migrated are still using VXLAN-GPE. It's better to
> keep it till the day to remove the RTE item of VXLAN-GPE from DPDK.
>
Sorry, I was not clear enough maybe, I was asking more details on the
problem?
With a net/vxlan commit [1] in this release, (this commit is part of
-rc1), VXLAN & VXLAN-GPE headers combined and VXLAN-GBP header added to
this combined struct. VXLAN-GPE header is marked as deprecated.
Testpmd is also updated to use new headers, that is the commit in the
fixes tag of this patch.
But drivers using old, now depreciated, VXLAN structs won't able to use
testpmd to test, so I agree, may be I merged the patch too early.
As this patch was part of -rc1, I wonder why we didn't get any complaint
about not able to test VXLAN-GPE?
Btw, if we revert this patch, is there a way to test VXLAN-GBP? Because
it only exists as part of new combined VXLAN struct?
Instead of reverting the commit all together, is there way to keep old
capability in testpmd, but add feature to test VXLAN-GBP?
And another issue is, there can still some users of the VXLAN-GPE header
in the net library, perhaps that also deprecated immaturely.
Can you please send a deprecation note for combining VXLAN headers and
removing VXLAN-GPE in v24.11? Please CC all drivers implementing this
flow pattern. This can be way to highlight the issue to driver
maintainers and communicate the change with end users.
[1]
77cb7b18ad9b ("net: extend VXLAN header to support more extensions")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-17 7:11 Gavin Li
2024-07-19 20:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-22 7:10 ` Minggang(Gavin) Li
2024-07-22 9:36 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2024-07-22 13:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-22 13:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-22 14:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-23 6:29 ` Minggang(Gavin) Li
2024-07-23 7:37 ` [V2] " Gavin Li
2024-07-23 8:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-23 14:09 ` Minggang(Gavin) Li
2024-07-23 14:26 ` [V3] " Gavin Li
2024-07-23 16:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-23 16:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed8facda-9a13-4d84-8771-845bab4895f8@amd.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gavinl@nvidia.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).