* [PATCH] app/test-fib: fix possible division by zero
@ 2021-12-23 15:25 Vladimir Medvedkin
2022-01-11 16:15 ` Kevin Traynor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Medvedkin @ 2021-12-23 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: vladimir.medvedkin
This patch fixes the division by 0, which occurs if the number of routes is less than 10.
Can be triggered by passing -n argument with value < 10:
./dpdk-test-fib -- -n 9
...
Floating point exception (core dumped)
Fixes: 103809d032cd ("app/test-fib: add test application for FIB")
Cc: vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
---
app/test-fib/main.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-fib/main.c b/app/test-fib/main.c
index ecd420116a..9bc8b8a7ca 100644
--- a/app/test-fib/main.c
+++ b/app/test-fib/main.c
@@ -902,8 +902,9 @@ run_v4(void)
return -ret;
}
}
- printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
- (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
+ if (j != 0)
+ printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
+ (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
i += j;
}
@@ -930,8 +931,9 @@ run_v4(void)
return -ret;
}
}
- printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
- (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
+ if (j != 0)
+ printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
+ (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
i += j;
}
}
@@ -984,8 +986,9 @@ run_v4(void)
for (j = 0; j < (config.nb_routes - i) / k; j++)
rte_fib_delete(fib, rt[i + j].addr, rt[i + j].depth);
- printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
- (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
+ if (j != 0)
+ printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
+ (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
i += j;
}
@@ -996,8 +999,9 @@ run_v4(void)
rte_lpm_delete(lpm, rt[i + j].addr,
rt[i + j].depth);
- printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
- (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
+ if (j != 0)
+ printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
+ (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
i += j;
}
}
@@ -1097,8 +1101,9 @@ run_v6(void)
return -ret;
}
}
- printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
- (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
+ if (j != 0)
+ printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
+ (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
i += j;
}
@@ -1125,8 +1130,9 @@ run_v6(void)
return -ret;
}
}
- printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
- (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
+ if (j != 0)
+ printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
+ (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
i += j;
}
}
@@ -1183,8 +1189,9 @@ run_v6(void)
for (j = 0; j < (config.nb_routes - i) / k; j++)
rte_fib6_delete(fib, rt[i + j].addr, rt[i + j].depth);
- printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
- (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
+ if (j != 0)
+ printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
+ (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
i += j;
}
@@ -1195,8 +1202,9 @@ run_v6(void)
rte_lpm6_delete(lpm, rt[i + j].addr,
rt[i + j].depth);
- printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
- (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
+ if (j != 0)
+ printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
+ (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
i += j;
}
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] app/test-fib: fix possible division by zero
2021-12-23 15:25 [PATCH] app/test-fib: fix possible division by zero Vladimir Medvedkin
@ 2022-01-11 16:15 ` Kevin Traynor
2022-01-12 15:49 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Traynor @ 2022-01-11 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Medvedkin, dev
On 23/12/2021 15:25, Vladimir Medvedkin wrote:
> This patch fixes the division by 0, which occurs if the number of routes is less than 10.
> Can be triggered by passing -n argument with value < 10:
>
9 causing a divide by zero - another example of inflation :-)
> ./dpdk-test-fib -- -n 9
> ...
> Floating point exception (core dumped)
>
> Fixes: 103809d032cd ("app/test-fib: add test application for FIB")
> Cc: vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com
>
You probably want to add 'Cc: stable@dpdk.org' for this.
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test-fib/main.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-fib/main.c b/app/test-fib/main.c
> index ecd420116a..9bc8b8a7ca 100644
> --- a/app/test-fib/main.c
> +++ b/app/test-fib/main.c
> @@ -902,8 +902,9 @@ run_v4(void)
> return -ret;
> }
> }
> - printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> + if (j != 0)
> + printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
You are just not printing the result for these cases. Do you think it is
worth to print a warning message (one), and update any documentation so
the user is aware of the acceptable bounds?
> i += j;
> }
>
> @@ -930,8 +931,9 @@ run_v4(void)
> return -ret;
> }
> }
> - printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> + if (j != 0)
> + printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> i += j;
> }
> }
> @@ -984,8 +986,9 @@ run_v4(void)
> for (j = 0; j < (config.nb_routes - i) / k; j++)
> rte_fib_delete(fib, rt[i + j].addr, rt[i + j].depth);
>
> - printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> + if (j != 0)
> + printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> i += j;
> }
>
> @@ -996,8 +999,9 @@ run_v4(void)
> rte_lpm_delete(lpm, rt[i + j].addr,
> rt[i + j].depth);
>
> - printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> + if (j != 0)
> + printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> i += j;
> }
> }
> @@ -1097,8 +1101,9 @@ run_v6(void)
> return -ret;
> }
> }
> - printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> + if (j != 0)
> + printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> i += j;
> }
>
> @@ -1125,8 +1130,9 @@ run_v6(void)
> return -ret;
> }
> }
> - printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> + if (j != 0)
> + printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> i += j;
> }
> }
> @@ -1183,8 +1189,9 @@ run_v6(void)
> for (j = 0; j < (config.nb_routes - i) / k; j++)
> rte_fib6_delete(fib, rt[i + j].addr, rt[i + j].depth);
>
> - printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> + if (j != 0)
> + printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> i += j;
> }
>
> @@ -1195,8 +1202,9 @@ run_v6(void)
> rte_lpm6_delete(lpm, rt[i + j].addr,
> rt[i + j].depth);
>
> - printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> + if (j != 0)
> + printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
> i += j;
> }
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] app/test-fib: fix possible division by zero
2022-01-11 16:15 ` Kevin Traynor
@ 2022-01-12 15:49 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Medvedkin, Vladimir @ 2022-01-12 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Traynor, dev
Hi Kevin,
On 11/01/2022 17:15, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 23/12/2021 15:25, Vladimir Medvedkin wrote:
>> This patch fixes the division by 0, which occurs if the number of
>> routes is less than 10.
>> Can be triggered by passing -n argument with value < 10:
>>
>
> 9 causing a divide by zero - another example of inflation :-)
>
Too bad that we are not working in a wheel
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_theory), where division by 0 is
always defined :)
>> ./dpdk-test-fib -- -n 9
>> ...
>> Floating point exception (core dumped)
>>
>> Fixes: 103809d032cd ("app/test-fib: add test application for FIB")
>> Cc: vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com
>>
>
> You probably want to add 'Cc: stable@dpdk.org' for this.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-fib/main.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-fib/main.c b/app/test-fib/main.c
>> index ecd420116a..9bc8b8a7ca 100644
>> --- a/app/test-fib/main.c
>> +++ b/app/test-fib/main.c
>> @@ -902,8 +902,9 @@ run_v4(void)
>> return -ret;
>> }
>> }
>> - printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
>> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> + if (j != 0)
>> + printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
>> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>
>
> You are just not printing the result for these cases. Do you think it is
> worth to print a warning message (one), and update any documentation so
> the user is aware of the acceptable bounds?
>
Agree, I'll send v2
>> i += j;
>> }
>> @@ -930,8 +931,9 @@ run_v4(void)
>> return -ret;
>> }
>> }
>> - printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
>> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> + if (j != 0)
>> + printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
>> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> i += j;
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -984,8 +986,9 @@ run_v4(void)
>> for (j = 0; j < (config.nb_routes - i) / k; j++)
>> rte_fib_delete(fib, rt[i + j].addr, rt[i + j].depth);
>> - printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
>> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> + if (j != 0)
>> + printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
>> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> i += j;
>> }
>> @@ -996,8 +999,9 @@ run_v4(void)
>> rte_lpm_delete(lpm, rt[i + j].addr,
>> rt[i + j].depth);
>> - printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
>> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> + if (j != 0)
>> + printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
>> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> i += j;
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -1097,8 +1101,9 @@ run_v6(void)
>> return -ret;
>> }
>> }
>> - printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
>> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> + if (j != 0)
>> + printf("AVG FIB add %"PRIu64"\n",
>> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> i += j;
>> }
>> @@ -1125,8 +1130,9 @@ run_v6(void)
>> return -ret;
>> }
>> }
>> - printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
>> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> + if (j != 0)
>> + printf("AVG LPM add %"PRIu64"\n",
>> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> i += j;
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -1183,8 +1189,9 @@ run_v6(void)
>> for (j = 0; j < (config.nb_routes - i) / k; j++)
>> rte_fib6_delete(fib, rt[i + j].addr, rt[i + j].depth);
>> - printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
>> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> + if (j != 0)
>> + printf("AVG FIB delete %"PRIu64"\n",
>> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> i += j;
>> }
>> @@ -1195,8 +1202,9 @@ run_v6(void)
>> rte_lpm6_delete(lpm, rt[i + j].addr,
>> rt[i + j].depth);
>> - printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
>> - (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> + if (j != 0)
>> + printf("AVG LPM delete %"PRIu64"\n",
>> + (rte_rdtsc_precise() - start) / j);
>> i += j;
>> }
>> }
>>
>
--
Regards,
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-12 15:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-23 15:25 [PATCH] app/test-fib: fix possible division by zero Vladimir Medvedkin
2022-01-11 16:15 ` Kevin Traynor
2022-01-12 15:49 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).