From: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"john.mcnamara@intel.com" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
"juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"\"'Lukasz Wojciechowski'\"," <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/rcu: fix array subscript is above array bounds
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:59:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2f2899a-518c-f936-c975-b49242b06984@partner.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM8PR08MB5810C4B08673FA071091719D981F0@AM8PR08MB5810.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Honnappa,
If setting value lower than 2 makes no sense as there is no place for
worker thread, then the patch is perfectly fine
<snip>
>>> When RTE_MAX_LCORE value is small, following compiler errors are
>>> observed.
>>>
>>> ../app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c:296:54: error: iteration 2 invokes
>>> undefined behavior [-Werror=aggressive-loop-optimizations]
>>>
>>> ../app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c:315:55: error: array subscript is above
>>> array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
>>>
>>> Fixes: b87089b0bb19 ("test/rcu: add API and functional tests")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> -
>>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c index
>>> 0a9e5ecd1..848a68092 100644
>>> --- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
>>> +++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
>>> @@ -286,13 +286,13 @@ static int
>>> test_rcu_qsbr_start(void)
>>> {
>>> uint64_t token;
>>> - int i;
>>> + unsigned int i;
>>>
>>> printf("\nTest rte_rcu_qsbr_start()\n");
>>>
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_init(t[0], RTE_MAX_LCORE);
>>>
>>> - for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(t[0], enabled_core_ids[i]);
>>>
>>> token = rte_rcu_qsbr_start(t[0]);
>>> @@ -306,14 +306,18 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_check_reader(void *arg)
>>> {
>>> struct rte_rcu_qsbr *temp;
>>> uint8_t read_type = (uint8_t)((uintptr_t)arg);
>>> + unsigned int i;
>>>
>>> temp = t[read_type];
>>>
>>> /* Update quiescent state counter */
>>> - rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(temp, enabled_core_ids[0]);
>>> - rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(temp, enabled_core_ids[1]);
>>> - rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(temp, enabled_core_ids[2]);
>>> - rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(temp, enabled_core_ids[3]);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++) {
>>> + if (i % 2 == 0)
>>> + rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(temp, enabled_core_ids[i]);
>>> + else
>>> + rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(temp,
>>> + enabled_core_ids[i]);
>>> + }
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -324,7 +328,8 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_check_reader(void *arg)
>>> static int
>>> test_rcu_qsbr_check(void)
>>> {
>>> - int i, ret;
>>> + int ret;
>>> + unsigned int i;
>>> uint64_t token;
>>>
>>> printf("\nTest rte_rcu_qsbr_check()\n"); @@ -342,7 +347,7 @@
>>> test_rcu_qsbr_check(void)
>>> ret = rte_rcu_qsbr_check(t[0], token, true);
>>> TEST_RCU_QSBR_RETURN_IF_ERROR((ret == 0), "Blocking QSBR
>> check");
>>> - for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(t[0], enabled_core_ids[i]);
>>>
>>> ret = rte_rcu_qsbr_check(t[0], token, false); @@ -357,7 +362,7 @@
>>> test_rcu_qsbr_check(void)
>>> /* Threads are offline, hence this should pass */
>>> TEST_RCU_QSBR_RETURN_IF_ERROR((ret == 0), "Non-blocking QSBR
>>> check");
>>>
>>> - for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(t[0], enabled_core_ids[i]);
>>>
>>> ret = rte_rcu_qsbr_check(t[0], token, true); @@ -365,7 +370,7 @@
>>> test_rcu_qsbr_check(void)
>>>
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_init(t[0], RTE_MAX_LCORE);
>>>
>>> - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(t[0], enabled_core_ids[i]);
>>>
>>> token = rte_rcu_qsbr_start(t[0]);
>>> @@ -928,7 +933,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_dq_functional(int32_t size, int32_t
>> esize, uint32_t flags)
>>> static int
>>> test_rcu_qsbr_dump(void)
>>> {
>>> - int i;
>>> + unsigned int i;
>>>
>>> printf("\nTest rte_rcu_qsbr_dump()\n");
>>>
>>> @@ -945,7 +950,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_dump(void)
>>>
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(t[0], enabled_core_ids[0]);
>>>
>>> - for (i = 1; i < 3; i++)
>>> + for (i = 1; i < num_cores; i++)
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(t[1], enabled_core_ids[i]);
>>>
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_dump(stdout, t[0]);
>>> @@ -1095,7 +1100,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_3qs(void)
>>> {
>>> uint64_t token[3];
>>> uint32_t c;
>>> - int i;
>>> + int i, num_readers;
>>> int32_t pos[3];
>>>
>>> writer_done = 0;
>>> @@ -1118,7 +1123,11 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_3qs(void)
>>> thread_info[0].ih = 0;
>>>
>>> /* Reader threads are launched */
>>> - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
>>> + /* Keep the number of reader threads low to reduce
>>> + * the execution time.
>>> + */
>>> + num_readers = num_cores < 4 ? num_cores : 4;
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_readers; i++)
>>> rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rcu_qsbr_reader,
>> &thread_info[0],
>>> enabled_core_ids[i]);
>>>
>>> @@ -1151,7 +1160,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_3qs(void)
>>>
>>> /* Check the quiescent state status */
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_check(t[0], token[0], true);
>>> - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_readers; i++) {
>>> c = hash_data[0][0][enabled_core_ids[i]];
>>> if (c != COUNTER_VALUE && c != 0) {
>>> printf("Reader lcore %d did not complete #0 = %d\n",
>> @@ -1169,7
>>> +1178,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_3qs(void)
>>>
>>> /* Check the quiescent state status */
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_check(t[0], token[1], true);
>>> - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_readers; i++) {
>>> c = hash_data[0][3][enabled_core_ids[i]];
>>> if (c != COUNTER_VALUE && c != 0) {
>>> printf("Reader lcore %d did not complete #3 = %d\n",
>> @@ -1187,7
>>> +1196,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_3qs(void)
>>>
>>> /* Check the quiescent state status */
>>> rte_rcu_qsbr_check(t[0], token[2], true);
>>> - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_readers; i++) {
>>> c = hash_data[0][6][enabled_core_ids[i]];
>>> if (c != COUNTER_VALUE && c != 0) {
>>> printf("Reader lcore %d did not complete #6 = %d\n",
>> @@ -1206,7
>>> +1215,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_3qs(void)
>>> writer_done = 1;
>>>
>>> /* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
>>> - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_readers; i++)
>>> if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>>> goto error;
>>> rte_hash_free(h[0]);
>>> @@ -1236,6 +1245,12 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_mw_mv_mqs(void)
>>> unsigned int i, j;
>>> unsigned int test_cores;
>>>
>>> + if (RTE_MAX_LCORE < 5 || num_cores < 4) {
>>> + printf("Not enough cores for %s, expecting at least 5\n",
>>> + __func__);
>>> + return TEST_SKIPPED;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> writer_done = 0;
>>> test_cores = num_cores / 4;
>>> test_cores = test_cores * 4;
>>> @@ -1321,11 +1336,6 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_main(void)
>>> {
>>> uint16_t core_id;
>>>
>>> - if (rte_lcore_count() < 5) {
>>> - printf("Not enough cores for rcu_qsbr_autotest, expecting at
>> least 5\n");
>>> - return TEST_SKIPPED;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> num_cores = 0;
>>> RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(core_id) {
>>> enabled_core_ids[num_cores] = core_id;
>> --
>> Lukasz Wojciechowski
>> Principal Software Engineer
>>
>> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>> Samsung Electronics
>> Office +48 22 377 88 25
>> l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com
--
Lukasz Wojciechowski
Principal Software Engineer
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Office +48 22 377 88 25
l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-20 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20201016060420eucas1p12f301a94eb4b4d19a9ced5c5cbd59c77@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-10-16 6:03 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-10-16 6:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/performance-thread: fix undef behavior Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-10-20 22:46 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-30 14:26 ` David Marchand
2020-10-20 0:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/rcu: fix array subscript is above array bounds Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-10-20 16:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-10-20 20:59 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski [this message]
2020-10-30 14:44 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2f2899a-518c-f936-c975-b49242b06984@partner.samsung.com \
--to=l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).