From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Chas Williams <chas3@att.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/bus: use RTE_IOVA_PA only if phys addresses are available
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:33:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f59b3806-9416-d178-49cc-424edea66a63@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180907155843.96465-1-dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
On 07-Sep-18 4:58 PM, Darek Stojaczyk wrote:
> When neither RTE_IOVA_VA nor RTE_IOVA_PA was explicitly
> requested, DPDK would currently fallback to the default
> RTE_IOVA_PA mode and possibly encounter a failure later
> on if running as a non-priviledged user. Attempting to
> use RTE_IOVA_VA if no phys addresses are available may
> help in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> * added a missing rte_memory.h include
>
> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c
> index 0943851cc..68c581b8a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> #include <rte_bus.h>
> #include <rte_debug.h>
> #include <rte_string_fns.h>
> +#include <rte_memory.h>
>
> #include "eal_private.h"
>
> @@ -236,9 +237,19 @@ rte_bus_get_iommu_class(void)
> mode |= bus->get_iommu_class();
> }
>
> - if (mode != RTE_IOVA_VA) {
> - /* Use default IOVA mode */
> - mode = RTE_IOVA_PA;
> + if (mode == RTE_IOVA_VA)
> + return RTE_IOVA_VA;
> +
> + if (mode & RTE_IOVA_PA) {
> + /* Not all buses support RTE_IOVA_VA, fallback to RTE_IOVA_PA */
> + return RTE_IOVA_PA;
> + }
> +
> + if (rte_eal_using_phys_addrs()) {
> + /* Default to RTE_IOVA_PA only if it's supported */
> + return RTE_IOVA_PA;
> }
> - return mode;
> +
> + /* Since RTE_IOVA_PA is unsupported, fallback to RTE_IOVA_VA */
> + return RTE_IOVA_VA;
> }
>
This is a good change, however I think that this is too pessimistic. If
i don't have any devices that explictly require IOVA_PA, i should be
running in IOVA_VA mode.
This of course doesn't take hotplug into account, so a command-line
switch to force one or the other should also be available.
For example, at startup, i might have devices bound to VFIO, so IOVA_VA
mode is picked. However, even though at a time of startup none of the
devices require physical addresses, i also know that i might later
hotplug a device that requires IOVA_PA (leaving the question of hotplug
brokenness aside for now...) - currently, this scenario will not work,
as i will be forced to use IOVA_VA mode unless i happen to have a
IOVA_PA device available at startup.
Similarly, if i'm running DPDK as root but am only using virtual devices
like pcap, i should be able to force DPDK into using VA addresses [*],
yet currently i will be forced to use IOVA_PA if i don't *also* have a
few devices bound exclusively to VFIO.
[*] Do we have vdev devices that require IOVA_PA? I can't think of any...
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-17 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 15:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Darek Stojaczyk
2018-09-07 15:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Darek Stojaczyk
2018-09-17 10:33 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2018-09-17 13:06 ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2018-10-30 12:58 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-28 23:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-30 10:25 ` Burakov, Anatoly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f59b3806-9416-d178-49cc-424edea66a63@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).