From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kni: fix device address set
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:21:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6c6740c-0055-a31d-4c2a-622613418e23@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220406201828.6eac9e56@hermes.local>
Hi,
在 2022/4/7 11:18, Stephen Hemminger 写道:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:44:23 +0800
> "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Stephen,
>> I think this is a good option, but the macro definition is like:
>> +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3, 14, 0)
>> +#define ether_addr_copy(dst, src) memcpy(dst, src, ETH_ALEN)
>> +#endif
>
> Minimal supported DPDK version is 4.4 now. So this is not a problem.
I did not catch your meaning. I think this is a problem.
Acording to current definition, we can only use "ether_addr_copy" on
linux platform of version 3.13.0(or below).
How about the situaction on other linux version, like 3.14.0(or upper)?
>
> Note: 4.4 kernel reached end of support window in Febrary 2022.
> It is supported by the SLTS project but it would be unwise
> to use later DPDK on a kernel that is stuck being supported until 2036.
>
> Apparently my patch to update it to current LTS 4.9 is sitting
> stuck in patchwork.
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-06 8:22 Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-06 15:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-04-07 0:44 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-07 3:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-04-07 6:21 ` Min Hu (Connor) [this message]
2022-04-07 7:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-07 8:08 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-07 8:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-25 3:58 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-23 9:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-31 15:32 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-01 2:01 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-06-01 1:59 ` [PATCH v4] " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-06-01 9:02 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-02 6:58 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-06-02 6:54 ` [PATCH v5] " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-06-03 11:50 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-02 15:31 ` [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6c6740c-0055-a31d-4c2a-622613418e23@huawei.com \
--to=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).