DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com>
To: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Juraj Linkeš" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>,
	"Honnappa Nagarahalli" <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	"Paul Szczepanek" <paul.szczepanek@arm.com>,
	"Alex Chapman" <alex.chapman@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dts: add ability to send/receive multiple packets
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 17:23:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6ff86c2-f509-405b-bb45-a40b22aaf314@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAA20USrANpvxnh82VfMO+xKgPYrGCVhxL84i32ZCJ6cQQ-P5w@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/08/2024 16:10, Jeremy Spewock wrote:
> <snip>
>> +    def match_all_packets(
>> +        self, expected_packets: list[Packet], received_packets: list[Packet]
>> +    ) -> None:
> 
> This is a very interesting approach to comparing what you expect to
> what you received. I hadn't seen counters used before but they seem
> useful for this purpose. This method reminds me a lot of the filtering
> process that was discussed in bugzilla ticket 1438
> (https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1438) where there was some talk
> about how to handle the noise vs what you received. This is different
> in a few ways though of course in that it allows you to specify
> multiple different criteria that are acceptable rather than just
> getting the payload and really only concerns itself with matching
> lists instead of doing any filtering.
> 
> The main reason I mention this is it brought up a question for me: Do
> you think, in the future when the payload filtering method is
> implemented, these two methods will co-exist or it would make more
> sense to just let test suites get their noise-free list of packets and
> then check that what they care about is present? I think a method like
> this might be useful in some more niche cases where you have multiple
> packet structures to look for, so I don't doubt there are some reasons
> to have both, I was just wondering if you had thought about it or had
> an opinion.

I am not actually entirely sure, it sounds as if everything has space 
for their own case. This method is useful to just plainly check that all 
the packets we sent came back, simple and straightforward. Payload 
filtering can be more niche and complex. I think if it can provide the 
same level of functionality as this function, it can be replaced for 
sure. But in that case it sounds like the test developer would be tied 
to a specific payload. In the case of random packet generation I don't 
think it would work, in which case they could both coexist.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-06 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-06 12:14 [PATCH 0/4] dts: add pktgen and testpmd changes Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] dts: add ability to send/receive multiple packets Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] dts: add random generation seed setting Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] dts: add random packet generator Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] dts: add ability to start/stop ports Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] dts: add ability to start/stop testpmd ports Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] dts: add testpmd set ports queues Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add pktgen and testpmd changes Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:46   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dts: add ability to send/receive multiple packets Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-09 15:10     ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-09-06 16:23       ` Luca Vizzarro [this message]
2024-09-09 14:12         ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-08-23 10:17     ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-06 16:30       ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:46   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dts: add random generation seed setting Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-09 15:10     ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-08-23 10:30     ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-08-06 12:46   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dts: add random packet generator Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-09 15:11     ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-08-23 11:58     ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-06 16:31       ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-06 12:46   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] dts: add ability to start/stop testpmd ports Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-09 15:13     ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-09-06 16:41       ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-23 12:16     ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-06 16:46       ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-09  7:32         ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-09 14:20         ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-09-09 15:16           ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-08-06 12:46   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] dts: add testpmd set ports queues Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-09 15:14     ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-08-20 16:04       ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-09-06 16:51       ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-08-23 12:22     ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-06 16:53       ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-09 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] dts: add pktgen and testpmd changes Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-09 11:01   ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dts: add ability to send/receive multiple packets Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-09 17:12     ` Patrick Robb
2024-09-09 11:01   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] dts: add random generation seed setting Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-09 11:01   ` [PATCH v3 3/5] dts: add random packet generator Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-09 11:01   ` [PATCH v3 4/5] dts: add ability to start/stop testpmd ports Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-09 11:54     ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-09 14:20     ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-09-09 11:01   ` [PATCH v3 5/5] dts: add testpmd set ports queues Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-09 12:01     ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-09 14:20     ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-09-09 15:50 ` [PATCH 0/4] dts: add pktgen and testpmd changes Juraj Linkeš

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6ff86c2-f509-405b-bb45-a40b22aaf314@arm.com \
    --to=luca.vizzarro@arm.com \
    --cc=alex.chapman@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
    --cc=paul.szczepanek@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).