DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Juraj Linkeš" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
To: jspewock@iol.unh.edu, alex.chapman@arm.com,
	Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com, wathsala.vithanage@arm.com,
	Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, paul.szczepanek@arm.com,
	npratte@iol.unh.edu, thomas@monjalon.net,
	yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com, probb@iol.unh.edu
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 14:16:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7792b64-e191-4d01-a75b-e3c8ceb4b2b5@pantheon.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812172251.41131-2-jspewock@iol.unh.edu>



On 12. 8. 2024 19:22, jspewock@iol.unh.edu wrote:
> From: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
> 
> The DTS framework in its current state supports binding ports to
> different drivers on the SUT node but not the TG node. The TG node
> already has the information that it needs about the different drivers
> that it has available in the configuration file, but it did not
> previously have access to the devbind script, so it did not use that
> information for anything.
> 
> This patch moves the steps to copy the DPDK tarball into the node class
> rather than the SUT node class, and calls this function on the TG node
> as well as the SUT. It also moves the driver binding step into the Node
> class and triggers the same pattern of binding to ports that existed on
> the SUT on the TG.
> 

This is a very inefficient way to do this. We'll have to build DPDK 
twice and that's very time consuming. I was thinking in terms of just 
copying the script to the TG node and storing its location on the TG 
node. We should have access to the script whether DTS is run from the 
repository or a tarball.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-09 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-12 17:22 [PATCH 0/1] dts: add driver binding on TG jspewock
2024-08-12 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/1] dts: add binding to different drivers to TG node jspewock
2024-08-12 17:49   ` Nicholas Pratte
2024-09-09 12:16   ` Juraj Linkeš [this message]
2024-09-09 15:55     ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-09-16 10:04       ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-18 18:50         ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-09-19  9:10           ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-09-12 13:00   ` Patrick Robb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7792b64-e191-4d01-a75b-e3c8ceb4b2b5@pantheon.tech \
    --to=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com \
    --cc=alex.chapman@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=npratte@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=paul.szczepanek@arm.com \
    --cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
    --cc=yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).