From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5436CBF for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:00:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f126so170870813wma.1 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 05:00:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zcHmWgWgBNLuzKzXY+6DqvsYg2EJzxeV6OCyOVSD4KY=; b=Mlp10/rsU/s/PgvbYbof6Ena13Cp73BCZJR8fSfGo27s6JFZLz4MeYmMklIfouj7MF 5QX9sTEMED9XwGBw2Nfxvz8t+ZIc/GWhQMWCFDH6WDgsG6TwwNFM5oi8hJnF2apWOsKd 6jpi719n94VLHdpTmgoXBu4mqPK1Mec3fzMfdkJrPtINKBdc1fvyYy4bLa/YDTNQY4ro faeiWZ8I6rckZTWaaWpMOSXaPr6NQUQPtIiA7mpmbPr8k4Kq2NYlWMYA4y8eJYgzEFf1 /alsd8qH1JfqpkeTqhXuCLVWbbNqcpPEp3gKIPjBZyO9vrZwFVdxGlGvq56+C4TVUOx1 zq5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zcHmWgWgBNLuzKzXY+6DqvsYg2EJzxeV6OCyOVSD4KY=; b=MxApESwDxvjVZfkK4ivQ/ri0fwx2/wf8uluqHO+Q5nDo9PeXGOEt6e4SIlFbESvBzh s5JPzXSMdUjsXvVOyh/ZwtbmwrypOo1NpuiR0tP9x+xxdODiLE/ZGhDAcnOo/Bw2jYwF zhyEkd2hcRyO553Q75LZRm68stIh+cPNspcljTyMGpzEWc+brl16es54Z2+MFG9KYBcd iJD0jlB/1dEQ4jdPhjZFEahwntuqlYwbGE/AR6LIj9/llMr6ykXLpKRooryKiMRkH1Sj 9toSAAAKNOQfj9h+BBE7Hp43LtSgQvwsIFhcBp9IKcMKfYN89OCPs4GcLf29upKn5MlX o1UQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL4q5rAGn/AbQg75FlTaJ7CFHuXJNoeQeJQjN9wnZL/hJ4wjRPn2gHizhVBZYI7vheP X-Received: by 10.194.58.239 with SMTP id u15mr20509728wjq.73.1467806430564; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 05:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (LFbn-1-8274-170.w81-254.abo.wanadoo.fr. [81.254.171.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bb4sm8176138wjb.32.2016.07.06.05.00.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jul 2016 05:00:29 -0700 (PDT) To: "Mcnamara, John" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <1467733310-20875-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1467733310-20875-2-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> From: Olivier MATZ Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:00:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/18] doc: add template for release notes 16.11 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:00:32 -0000 Hi John, On 07/06/2016 01:48 PM, Mcnamara, John wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz >> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:42 PM >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/18] doc: add template for release notes >> 16.11 > > Hi, > > This is useful but it is probably a little bit early since it should include the shared lib versions from the final 16.07 release notes. > > Also, is it intentionally part of a patchset for a "software parser for packet type"? It should probably be separate. Sorry, I should have add an explanation: I just wanted to have the patchset applying on current head (16.07-rc1) without conflicts. Indeed some commits add some entries in the release note. I agree, at the end, this commit should not be part of the patchset. Regards, Olivier