From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E933C1B2A0 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:58:04 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2018 09:58:04 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,345,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="9402001" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.48]) ([10.237.220.48]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2018 09:58:03 -0800 To: Matan Azrad , Gaetan Rivet Cc: dev@dpdk.org References: <1513703669-29363-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:58:02 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1513703669-29363-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] improve failsafe performance X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:58:05 -0000 On 12/19/2017 5:14 PM, Matan Azrad wrote: > This fail-safe series should improve some cycles in failsafe data path. > It is obvious that we cannot improve a lot because the most of data path functionality are done by the sub devices data path. > So the expectation from this series is just to improve some cycles in sub devices management done by fail-safe PMD. > I saw ~1.7% MPPS improvement for 1 core 1 queue io-forwarding mode - 2 sub-devices(mlx4 primary). > > Matan Azrad (3): > net/failsafe: fix Rx safe check compiler hint > net/failsafe: mitigate data plan atomic operations > net/failsafe: improve Rx sub-devices iteration Hi Gaetan, Any comment on this patchset? Thanks, ferruh