From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFDCA054D; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:48:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46D340690; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:48:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2F74067A for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:48:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1613576883; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bFAF77et/gTpnts3wc6OEWaa0IN98uBVDMvvnvqDKx0=; b=E5f0kV/aASeMUyz3hZgOGRpqXYUEG4dzffuzsNs5Bsq9A9ZphRDHhEOLkoqi/dPSe6IUrx 8f7iZSWBaYnqaz8DEQ0SzHINsf6BFu9ZCyUuw+SUQIDzEBVBo1F/7RaSWhGxZBaItprB2r F9y8QBtl7j3eYW4T2jSD9lru9kpLZfw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-578-z8C9WFWkN5KE7GUg7xaxhw-1; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:48:00 -0500 X-MC-Unique: z8C9WFWkN5KE7GUg7xaxhw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B086B1934104; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-114-166.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.166]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7022260C61; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:47:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Juraj =?utf-8?Q?Linke=C5=A1?= Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, david.marchand@redhat.com, maicolgabriel@hotmail.com, dev@dpdk.org, Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com References: <1613554953-14736-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> <1613554953-14736-2-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:47:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1613554953-14736-2-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> ("Juraj \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Linke\=C5\=A1\=22's\?\= message of "Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:42:32 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] ci: remove x86 Travis jobs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Juraj Linke=C5=A1 writes: > Remove x86 jobs for which we don't have Travis credits. Leave arm64 jobs > for which we do have the credits. > > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > --- Individual developers will still derive benefit from those jobs, yes? I thought it was possible to use travis still for individual developer accounts. If that's true, then we shouldn't remove these jobs.