DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "Pattan\, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, "Rao\,
	Nikhil" <nikhil.rao@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>, Chas Williams <chas3@att.com>,
	"Richardson\, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] app/test: fix build when ring PMD is disabled
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 13:00:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7t8snlgz0g.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5ec5fe6-1e29-11a9-036a-1a0d9afd8d0d@intel.com> (Ferruh Yigit's message of "Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:54:52 +0000")

Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> writes:

> On 12/9/2019 1:38 PM, Pattan, Reshma wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>>>>>> v3: add missing test event_eth_tx_adapter_autotest.
>> 
>> Just wondering, if is it ok to send me the v4 by reverting the test
>> case addition from run for this patch to get accepted, as fixing the
>> test case can be handled separately.
>
> Is the root cause of the failures missing '-d' parameter, why not provide that
> instead of not executing the test cases?

+1

> David, Aaron, Can it be possible to test providing '-d' paramter in travis and
> see if it fixes the issue?

It's always possible.  The best way would be to use one's own github
repo and travis-ci instance to test the changes and ensure they are
correct.  It's also possible to submit a patch to the list that has the
change and it will be applied and a build + test should happen.

> And what do you think splitting the patch into two, one fixes the build issues
> and other adding the missing testcases to the test suit?
>
>
>> 
>>>> Is this something that Nikhil should look into this as maintainer and fix in
>>> separate patch, I am afraid this is not my area of expertise.
>>>
>>> I agree that someone knowing of this test should be looking at it.
>>>
>>> My suggestion on adding this test was based on the fact that we were building
>>> this code test.
>>> But I was expecting that you test this addition.
>>>
>>> You shall not break the CI :-)

+1000 to this

>>> Please add this to your checklist for future submissions, or at least check the
>>> robot reports.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Marchand
>> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-09 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-17  9:41 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/test: fix make " Reshma Pattan
2019-10-17  9:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/test: fix meson " Reshma Pattan
2019-10-17  9:51   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-17  9:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2019-10-17  9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/test: fix make " Bruce Richardson
2019-10-17 11:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix " Reshma Pattan
2019-10-17 13:46   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-25  8:11   ` David Marchand
2019-10-25 15:40     ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-10-25 15:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Reshma Pattan
2019-10-27  8:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2019-10-29  9:36       ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-10-31  7:58         ` David Marchand
2019-10-31 10:18           ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-12-09 13:38           ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-12-09 16:54             ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-12-09 18:00               ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2019-12-18 11:58     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Reshma Pattan
2019-12-18 16:07       ` Bruce Richardson
2019-12-18 16:23         ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-12-23  6:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Reshma Pattan
2020-01-19 21:50         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-20  9:55           ` Rao, Nikhil
2020-01-20 17:36         ` Bruce Richardson
2020-02-16 18:10           ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7t8snlgz0g.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=chas3@att.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).