From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, john.mcnamara@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Coverity scan
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:34:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7ta74m7q3d.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8562014.CDJkKcVGEf@xps> (Thomas Monjalon's message of "Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:53:16 +0100")
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes:
> We have a public Coverity scan triggered by John for the community:
> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/dpdk-data-plane-development-kit
> Note there is a tool to help with this task:
> http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=coverity-submit.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.13
>
> I see two issues with this scan:
> - it is run manually
> - not all code is scanned currently
>
> Note that we should be able to run one scan per day for free:
> https://scan.coverity.com/faq#frequency
>
> With David, we looked at automating the Coverity scan,
> with the help of Travis automation:
> https://scan.coverity.com/travis_ci
> Such automation cannot be configured on the existing Coverity project.
Why not?
> I tried to open a new Coverity project connected to our GitHub.
I don't know that it will work. Either you'll need a separate GitHub,
or you'll need to use a special branch.
> I have a very poor confidence in Coverity/Travis/GitHub integration.
> I will explain below why.
Hrrm.. lots of projects use it. And they do just what you prescribe
below (skipping jobs/builds when on the coverity branch).
> 1/ The instructions were wrong. In this command, there are two mistakes:
> openssl s_client -connect https://scan.coverity.com:443 |
> sed -ne '/-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-/,/-END CERTIFICATE-/p' |
> sudo tee -a /etc/ssl/certs/ca-
> For the record, a proper a simpler command is:
> true | openssl s_client -connect scan.coverity.com:443 |
> openssl x509 |
> sudo tee -a /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt
Okay, that's fixable.
> 2/ The coverity scan is triggered as a job addon.
> The rest of the job must be cancelled with this tricky patch:
>
> -script: ./.ci/${TRAVIS_OS_NAME}-build.sh
> +script: if [ "${COVERITY_SCAN_BRANCH}" != 1 ] ; then ./.ci/${TRAVIS_OS_NAME}-build.sh ; fi
More than that, because we probably also want:
if ([[ "${TRAVIS_JOB_NUMBER##*.}" == "1" ]] && [[ "${TRAVIS_BRANCH}" == "coverity_scan" ]]); then ./.ci/${TRAVIS_OS_NAME}-build.sh ; fi
That will only do one job (which solves 3/ below)
> 3/ We need only to prepare the source code once per day.
> But our .travis.yml has many jobs which must be dropped or ignored.
>
> 4/ A big encrypted token must be added in the configuration:
> # encrypted COVERITY_SCAN_TOKEN
> - secure: "VgRYG9N5adKkM9/QpPgswn1c+VXS1mFVN0vgdjuC/bDv2x4u...etc..."
Why it's a problem?
> 5/ The addon is triggered when pushing to a specific branch
> (adding config for the record):
> coverity_scan:
> project:
> name: "DPDK/dpdk"
> notification_email: test-report@dpdk.org
> build_command_prepend: "meson build -Dexamples=all"
> build_command: "ninja -C build"
> branch_pattern: coverity_scan
>
> 6/ This attempt failed with this log (no more information):
> $ export PROJECT_NAME=DPDK/dpdk
> Coverity Scan analysis selected for branch coverity_scan.
> Coverity Scan API access denied. Check $PROJECT_NAME and $COVERITY_SCAN_TOKEN.
Probably there is an issue with the token + PROJECT_NAME.
>
> So I am giving up with Travis+Coverity.
> The only benefit of Travis is to have a central build configuration.
> So when a driver is enabled in Travis, it would be scanned in Coverity.
> Note: Coverity does a build step to prepare the sources.
I can try to assist with this if you've not completely abandoned the idea.
>
> Now the question: how can we better configure the community Coverity scan?
> I propose to set it up in our community lab.
> Comments? Suggestions?
Since we do have something working, but it's manual, is there a way to
at least make it happen automatically? Maybe some cron job?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 15:53 Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-11 17:34 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2020-03-11 18:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-11 18:35 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7ta74m7q3d.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).