From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410FD2C12 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:14:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99FE4804F0; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aconole-fed23 (dhcp-25-15.bos.redhat.com [10.18.25.15]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2UDEfTf028384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:14:41 -0400 From: Aaron Conole To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Panu Matilainen , "Lu\, Wenzhuo" , dev@dpdk.org, "Richardson\, Bruce" References: <1458682638-28378-1-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09090343E973@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <56F38F26.1030707@redhat.com> <2113478.WYverkV2By@xps13> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:14:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2113478.WYverkV2By@xps13> (Thomas Monjalon's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:51:07 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/7] drivers/net/e1000: Fix missing brackets X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:14:43 -0000 Thomas Monjalon writes: > 2016-03-24 08:54, Panu Matilainen: >> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/Makefile >> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ else >> # >> CFLAGS_BASE_DRIVER = -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-unused-parameter >> CFLAGS_BASE_DRIVER += -Wno-unused-variable >> +ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -ge 60 && echo 1), 1) >> +CFLAGS_BASE_DRIVER += -Wno-misleading-indentation >> +endif > > Aaron, have you tested this solution? > Are you going to provide a v3? I haven't yet tested this solution, but if folks are that opposed to changing the code, then I will test it and post a v3 of this particular patch in the series. Thanks so much for the reviews and time on this (Panu AND Thomas :-)), -Aaron