From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F677A0588; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D92F1DC78; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB011DC54 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587041074; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I9CF3d2fEaiogxsFgSxyDXvln6MC73NzGidQekiOSk8=; b=KXTWXI+trpQ8p4V9lMKibCMgmos9CIvYoU+s7tF1wEWRRT5Dh78efMbE7jmVb8STWvITF3 LD8odM/VAR9bz7lHk1uJOshfFv8YKyPxTH5ys7C7irWKCO1gNJvBJ9ZT4EgCchMxe3aNRw X3zTXoOrSLkB5QzkqHcEWj9sI9Yrfgs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-189-zVmLWCZOOlOEJZ6rVpz1eQ-1; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: zVmLWCZOOlOEJZ6rVpz1eQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EAEF18B9FD5; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-116-136.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.136]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A15260BEC; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:44:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, Michael Santana References: <20200416110053.2547791-1-thomas@monjalon.net> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 08:44:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200416110053.2547791-1-thomas@monjalon.net> (Thomas Monjalon's message of "Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:00:53 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Thomas Monjalon writes: > Travis is not reliable for native Arm and PPC: > https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619/6 > > In order to get reliable Travis reports, > the use of Arm machines is removed until Travis fixes it. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- We should add back the cross-build if we do this - at least then we could have a reliable compilation test of Arm64 code. Does it make sense?