From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8EEA0526; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 22:48:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D2E1DE2C; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 22:48:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42081DE1F for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 22:48:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594241327; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UMD3Qv44zditN8WmaaRJCma1pTDPpo1GGfyUNh3lBZM=; b=Ucv6MFXl2N+cc9kiGQnrc0+4K2lU7wRylxIOV9L91iNqMX63sa/DKtSBNbYIeR3Pr33qzd i/8FmHHm1U/yjPIsU2YBLMDTZ1viSpu1N8afkXEdHWVX9AcitqTExQgkfG/g5Ttd6SjHAs 21hEkEK0q9hFAHUbN8LTC9cC/nL750M= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-209-6m6OZ5PbMqebqNdB3tUg_Q-1; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:48:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6m6OZ5PbMqebqNdB3tUg_Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6CEA801E6A; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 20:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-114-181.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.181]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA47273FEA; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 20:48:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: David Marchand Cc: Phil Yang , dev , David Christensen , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "Ruifeng Wang \(Arm Technology China\)" , nd , Dodji Seketeli , Neil Horman , Ray Kinsella , Harman Kalra References: <1591871065-12461-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> <1591871065-12461-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:48:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: (David Marchand's message of "Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:59:12 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: use c11 atomics for interrupt status X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" David Marchand writes: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 3:43 PM Aaron Conole wrote: >> > Note: checking on the test-report ml, I saw nothing, but ovsrobot did >> > catch the issue with this change too, Aaron? >> >> I don't have archives back to Jun 11 on the robot server. I think it >> doesn't preserve forever (and the archives seem to go back only until >> Jul 03). I will update it. >> >> I do see that we have a failed travis job: >> >> https://travis-ci.org/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds/697180855 >> >> I'm surprised this didn't go out. Have we seen other failures to report >> of the ovs robot recently? I can double check the job config. >> > > We do receive reports from the robot atm. > And I found one failure reported this morning. > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-July/142421.html > > Maybe transient failures wrt mail delivery? > Just throwing an idea.. It's possible. I'll check out the mail server.