From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300CBA0A02; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D83140EA0; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114D2140D19 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616690492; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hgqu7uXl0+CWD1jMMDeip3CYO3O6HHDI5udOCKijxVQ=; b=Tj0QN+9mLy8NEENZ8of2wm98ZtE9yHNls/XehFrHfNxnM8sBdmR6O8oN9HF3FkYstoqHJC Cz9V/dYqFOq3QKyYfzwZ1pAE98TuEKkCO1OQheKkORTOmRNxP+do4w7VqV09FyNZMw7Mk0 oHw0pddFSGV8wM66Z7aQ31AA/sMj3go= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-248-IFggDjWZOEibmK8Glqxtwg-1; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:41:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: IFggDjWZOEibmK8Glqxtwg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804C8101965A; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-115-49.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.115.49]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F1401037EA2; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:40:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com References: <20200416110053.2547791-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <6504633.9roynsBark@thomas> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:40:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6504633.9roynsBark@thomas> (Thomas Monjalon's message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:46:07 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Thomas Monjalon writes: > 16/04/2020 13:00, Thomas Monjalon: >> Travis is not reliable for native Arm and PPC: >> https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619/6 >> >> In order to get reliable Travis reports, >> the use of Arm machines is removed until Travis fixes it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > We managed without applying this patch. > > After one year passed, what is the situation today regarding Travis? > Can we rely on Travis service? So far, yes. > For which workload? Which architecture? I think for all of them. Looking at even the failures which pop up for the latest patches, they seem like real failures. ex: https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493722400 https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493688879 https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493624012 https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493611597 These are ABI, and doc failures - different arches, etc. Seems like it's quite usable. > Aaron, what do you recommend? I think we should drop this patch - Travis continues to be useful even for individual developers checking their own results. It seems the service works quite a bit better now for the project as well, thanks to Honnappa and other ARM folks for working with them.