From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DC9201 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:54:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D84AC054910; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:54:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4D84AC054910 Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 4D84AC054910 Received: from dhcp-25-97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-123-88.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.88]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E786160BE5; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:54:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Bruce Richardson , dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger References: <20170322201940.24028-1-aconole@redhat.com> <20170323140431.GB8688@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <16753267.SotxTgSKUM@xps13> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:54:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <16753267.SotxTgSKUM@xps13> (Thomas Monjalon's message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:06:01 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/14] eal: Remove most causes of panic on init X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:54:56 -0000 Thomas Monjalon writes: > 2017-03-23 14:04, Bruce Richardson: >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:19:26PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: >> > In many cases, it's enough to simply let the application know that the >> > call to initialize DPDK has failed. A complete halt can then be >> > decided by the application based on error returned (and the app could >> > even attempt a possible re-attempt after some corrective action by the >> > user or application). >> > >> Ran a sanity test compiling with clang on FreeBSD 11 and had a quick >> scan of the patches. All looks reasonably ok to me. Did not test on >> linux. >> >> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson > > Applied, thank you so much for this work. > > Do you plan to continue hunting rte_panic in DPDK? I don't have any concrete plans to do so, but as I see them, I'll generate patches.