From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882DFA0500; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 19:03:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B247D1BE9E; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 19:03:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF9A1BE9D for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 19:03:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576605829; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ksTQMUZaCfIemPXZOnXiDEDbQ7MyeT5n/y96H++ulzM=; b=DjydikPQJmuo0WIew61pGyB0vRvzV2vmNG8wI25dnx7+5GBu+7DepQ6gFK8X0o/19Eaxek 95PtPbTOGamV87ydEQjF4hYVLAGGLAc0lNay+hB0Ccu7Wb+m2meCOEvQC5XFtXo+0Oy7nV x82R2ddsupROVgxTgUo0vskUY77CLTg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-266-rE6kMRdRMruRJuN7Cuz6BA-1; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:03:46 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E65A100551C; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (unknown [10.18.25.127]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA6260C81; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:03:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: "Laatz\, Kevin" Cc: dev@dpdk.org References: <20191217114259.35575-1-kevin.laatz@intel.com> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:03:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Laatz's message of "Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:04:19 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-MC-Unique: rE6kMRdRMruRJuN7Cuz6BA-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: update travis to use bionic X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" "Laatz, Kevin" writes: > On 17/12/2019 14:44, Aaron Conole wrote: >> Kevin Laatz writes: >> >>> Currently, the Travis CI is using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (Xenial) which is >>> becoming increasingly outdated. This patch updates Travis to use Ubuntu >>> 18.04 LTS (Bionic) which will give us the benefit of more up-to-date >>> packages being availble and the newer features that come with them. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Laatz >>> --- >>> .travis.yml | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml >>> index 8f90d06f2..6e0626353 100644 >>> --- a/.travis.yml >>> +++ b/.travis.yml >>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ compiler: >>> - gcc >>> - clang >>> -dist: xenial >>> +dist: bionic >> This LGTM. >> >>> os: >>> - linux >>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ aarch64_packages: &aarch64_packages >>> extra_packages: &extra_packages >>> - *required_packages >>> - - [libbsd-dev, libpcap-dev, libcrypto++-dev, libjansson4] >>> + - [libbsd-dev, libpcap-dev, libcrypto++-dev, libjansson4, abigail-to= ols] >> Will adding the abigail-tools automatically invoke the ABI checks? >> Otherwise, maybe it's best to save this for a future commit. >> >> I'll look for the robot build when it comes by. Thanks! > > Yes, the meson option that will be introduced with the "Add ABI > compatibility checks to the meson build" [1] patch set will be set to > "auto" meaning the checks will run if abidiff is found. Okay. I'm fine with that change. > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D7830 I noticed the shared builds are failing: https://travis-ci.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/268042693 But not sure what the issue is with librte_mempool_ring Can you see why it would fail under bionic? >> >>> build_32b_packages: &build_32b_packages >>> - *required_packages