From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA97A0563; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:50:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC7F1BE51; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:50:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com [63.128.21.74]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5575F2BF9 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:50:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1584449437; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=d6upleNOeq9fHalhEZj1Xed6S1Wcn9szZe3mYWb0c1Q=; b=IIIa2TQxbaNligxXM1RptnoYNIXMbdM/XExZ7Sbc6KME1SM9L3Er2aaDsx+IjCWB9lndC5 9Eli7Fv5ZPvn40AzLeh+6VREJt8cI8fTg1hV2pc+hmofQfnhncDBzDGET/LDOjx9Q+djYG nWceSw9Y45I0Ibo+hTJIzXHkxELMPvI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-76-_rFo5GhSOQqbaNJwp-kZ1g-1; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 08:50:34 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _rFo5GhSOQqbaNJwp-kZ1g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E5EC800D4E; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-116-107.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.107]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D72FD94947; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:50:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Ruifeng Wang Cc: maicolgabriel@hotmail.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech, nd@arm.com References: <20200225073236.135581-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20200313081614.195335-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20200313081614.195335-4-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 08:50:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200313081614.195335-4-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> (Ruifeng Wang's message of "Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:16:13 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] ci: proceed with verification without hugepage X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Ruifeng Wang writes: > As fast-tests suite generated with only applicable cases included, > hugepage is not a mandatory to run the test. > Ignore the result of hugepage set up, so that validation in environment > without hugepage can proceed. > > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > --- Acked-by: Aaron Conole