From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A7A374C for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 21:21:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF1D5F7B6; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:21:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 5EF1D5F7B6 Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 5EF1D5F7B6 Received: from dhcp-25-97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-123-178.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.178]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A565D9C1; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:21:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: dev@openvswitch.org Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Flavio Leitner , Ansis Atteka References: <20170705175634.7957-1-aconole@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:21:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Aaron Conole's message of "Fri, 07 Jul 2017 11:40:43 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] rhel/fedora: non-root OvS out of the box X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:21:09 -0000 Aaron Conole writes: > Aaron Conole writes: > >> This series attempts to introduce the ability to start and use >> Open vSwitch 'out of the box' as a non-root user. It does this by >> modifying the service files to pass the recently introduced --ovs-user >> argument around, and by making some minor tweaks to the passwd, group, >> and filesystem information. >> >> I prefixed the packaging work with 'redhat', but if rpm or packaging >> is a preferred prefx for that work, I can respin. >> >> The more controversial changes are: >> >> * This modifies the /etc/sysconfig/ file on install. >> * The dpdk support directly modifies /dev/hugepages with a call to chmod >> * A new user 'openvswitch', and up to two new groups 'openvswitch', and >> 'hugetlbfs' are created >> * A change to soexpand.pl to allow conditional inclusion of dpdk-related >> options >> > > An interesting development has occurred while testing this series. > > It seems that as part of a rowhammer mitigation, access to > /proc/self/pagemap ends up being restricted. This makes DPDK break in a > catastrophic way. > > One way of mitigating this is to keep the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability when > DPDK is enabled (not sure whether it would be a runtime or compile > time change). This means we end up keeping many root-user level > permissions that we probably shouldn't need or want. I was thinking > that when DPDK is compiled in, we would keep the CAP_SYS_ADMIN for the > first iteration of DB synchronization, and then drop it after calling > DPDK-init. That would prevent lazy loading, or being able to turn it > on without restarting the daemon (which I don't like). > > Another is to say that if DPDK is enabled at compile time, just don't > drop permissions at all. That approach seems really wrong, but it's a > possibility. > > Not sure what else can be done from the OvS side for this. I think it > could be possible to do something where before dropping privs, we cache > the pagemap and then feed it to DPDK during initialization, but that > will require work from DPDK side, and I'm not sure if it actually works > with DPDK (because I haven't looked into why the pagemap is being read > to begin with). > > So, I'm a bit stuck on this work, and asking for some opinions. > UPDATE: it seems that with DPDK 17.02+, this has been resolved. I'll wait for resubmit until after the following commit has been applied: https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-July/334893.html