From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3242C44147; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:48:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDB642E5D; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:48:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFD042E4A for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:48:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1717440496; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1oeFZBqwKucoz0CI3bGueuRzDHT0hn6Cl0WYILkGnVI=; b=FTA/qa208QOaDH3xgadUgsJpi4QTJUszrpob248G0ixe+m7OltosGmFHn9yJb2eSeQ2Tup i72GBBmgyKpRARJl8aeO19a7ymsl2AHdlfT94qRmLRx4dDVcpIhr6ee0Madlsq/8FgthJ/ QKxJyurPd6sYjbyqaZ4BaSe3VQ3BPs8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-344-1A5EVIRCO8iRQO3TqqjzyQ-1; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:48:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1A5EVIRCO8iRQO3TqqjzyQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76E1B80028D; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTRH0061144 (unknown [10.22.16.249]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF0D40EF7D; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:48:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Patrick Robb Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Morten =?utf-8?Q?Br=C3=B8rup?= , "NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" Subject: Re: Depends-on In-Reply-To: (Patrick Robb's message of "Fri, 31 May 2024 17:22:39 -0400") References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F4B8@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F4CE@smartserver.smartshare.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:48:12 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Patrick Robb writes: > * > Hi all, > > Found my way to this thread based on the CI testing call yesterday, as I = am about to put > together the blurb for the dpdk website testing page that documents suppo= rt (or lack > thereof) for depends-on in CI.=20 Thanks. > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:40=E2=80=AFAM Morten Br=C3=B8rup wrote: > > > From: Aaron Conole [mailto:aconole@redhat.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 16.34 > > >=20 > > I'll try to spend some time and add patch based support, but I think > > there was some weird tricky stuff going on. > > Series support suffices for this patch, so figuring out what is wrong wi= th that will make > me happy. :-) > > It probably doesn't make sense to add depends on individual patch support= , as the PW > maintainer and Thomas agreed on depends on series support only going forw= ard.=20 > > https://github.com/getpatchwork/git-pw/issues/71#issuecomment-1938927101