From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Harry Van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
David Marchand <dmarchan@redhat.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] service: stop lcore threads before 'finalize'
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:50:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7two9rxjst.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
I've noticed an occasional segfault from the build system in the
service_autotest and after talking with David (CC'd), it seems like it's
due to the rte_service_finalize deleting the lcore_states object while
active lcores are running.
The below patch is an attempt to solve it by first reassigning all the
lcores back to ROLE_RTE before releasing the memory. There is probably
a larger question for DPDK proper about actually closing the pending
lcore threads, but that's a separate issue. I've been running with the
patch for a while, and haven't seen the crash anymore on my system.
Thoughts? Is it acceptable as-is?
---
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
index 7e537b8cd2..7d13287bee 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ static struct rte_service_spec_impl *rte_services;
static struct core_state *lcore_states;
static uint32_t rte_service_library_initialized;
+static void service_lcore_uninit(void);
+
int32_t
rte_service_init(void)
{
@@ -122,6 +124,9 @@ rte_service_finalize(void)
if (!rte_service_library_initialized)
return;
+ /* Ensure that all service threads are returned to the ROLE_RTE
+ */
+ service_lcore_uninit();
rte_free(rte_services);
rte_free(lcore_states);
@@ -897,3 +902,14 @@ rte_service_dump(FILE *f, uint32_t id)
return 0;
}
+
+static void service_lcore_uninit(void)
+{
+ unsigned lcore_id;
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(lcore_id) {
+ if (!lcore_states[lcore_id].is_service_core)
+ continue;
+
+ while (rte_service_lcore_del(lcore_id) == -EBUSY);
+ }
+}
---
next reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 19:50 Aaron Conole [this message]
2020-01-17 8:17 ` David Marchand
2020-02-04 13:34 ` David Marchand
2020-02-04 14:50 ` Aaron Conole
2020-02-10 14:16 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-02-10 14:42 ` David Marchand
2020-02-20 13:25 ` David Marchand
2020-02-21 12:28 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-03-10 13:04 ` David Marchand
2020-03-10 13:27 ` Van Haaren, Harry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7two9rxjst.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).