From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0774843B76; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:37:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928BB402AC; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:37:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6187640270 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:37:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1709663839; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NRvVEMFj3FDPgsr/YB30PwHCuSJzXOnvZLp0P9tBztc=; b=Y6riVKIxg1Yfm7uNDfaFxJ0NO/EF6k8/nzC1s71ZUyu2EWjloAejx2CThjP6+lEGEr4vtw HW6Q3jGLbS9jRhhQulvGr0pq2E4rru518iT6REklrnFnZ7Y+vwSClgvgqENYX8iRilVfT8 zsP9J8jP+QbA3NAJ7tw0zVo2H4bHH0I= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-574-lGKbIa8CNNG9ZFXrUPdpaQ-1; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 13:37:14 -0500 X-MC-Unique: lGKbIa8CNNG9ZFXrUPdpaQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA8A1803CE7; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 18:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTPC1VM0NT (dhcp-17-72.bos.redhat.com [10.18.17.72]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76F92400E6D6; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 18:37:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: "Power, Ciara" Cc: "Sivaramakrishnan, VenkatX" , "Akhil Goyal" , "Ji, Kai" , "probb@iol.unh.edu" , dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: reg. https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=31200 - patch result References: Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 13:37:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Ciara Power's message of "Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:40:56 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.2 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org "Power, Ciara" writes: > + Patrick > > =20 > > From: Power, Ciara=20 > Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 10:05 AM > To: Sivaramakrishnan, VenkatX ; Akhil= Goyal > Cc: Ji, Kai ; Aaron Conole > Subject: RE: reg. https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D31= 200 - patch result > > =20 > > Hi folks, > > =20 > > Had a quick look, I can also see this: > > crypto/ipsec_mb: IPSec_MB version >=3D 1.4.0 is required, found version 1= .2.0 This version of ipsec_mb is less than 1 year old. Did this pass any other CI testing? I would be surprised if it did - I'm not sure any downstream environments that would be using it already. > I guess the installed PMD .so file isn=E2=80=99t created because they are= not compiled in, due to the minimum version on > environment not meeting the new requirements. I don't see any such new requirements anywhere on the crypto tree. The only change I know about was for QAT to try and default to IPSec_MB 1.4, but it is supposed to fall back to OpenSSL if that is unavailable. Did this change? > CC=E2=80=99ing Aaron, who might know about upgrading that environment to = ipsec-mb v1.4. > > =20 > > Thanks, > > Ciara > > =20 > > From: Sivaramakrishnan, VenkatX =20 > Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 10:45 AM > To: Akhil Goyal > Cc: Ji, Kai ; Power, Ciara > Subject: reg. https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D31200 = - patch result > > =20 > > Hi Akhil, > > =20 > > I would like to provide details of the failures > > =20 > > =20 > > * > > =20 > > =20 > > Failures details: > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > "Build and test" failed for "librte_crypto_ipsec_mb.so".=20 > > doc: remove outdated version details =C2=B7 ovsrobot/dpdk@f40ab34 (github= .com) > > Error: cannot find librte_crypto_ipsec_mb.so.24.0 in install > > =20 > > Looks like, =E2=80=9Cipsec mb=E2=80=9D was not installed on the server.= =20 > > =20 > > However, the patch changes are related to the Doc update. Hope that this = will not impact patch merging=20 > > =20 > > Thank you. > > =20 > > Best Regards, > > Venkat.