From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CC8A034F; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 20:37:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6F240FDF; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 20:37:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3254003C for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 20:37:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614022664; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SPCKCwak7CmHaVM5Nhg56l342JsFPNTAfQWcUif2LWg=; b=QIDLGruqlc8A/LEw8x0gEdY3B+Qs8Wb5nDzt6yUGPrWhokR6oSKDDXIRMdfGnaCvuAa5C2 3U5Ch8/SzZo59B4NJgUKF0v/SzG/8dj0XlCXfmLc5x3VF3/RQZACrQVJnniLp2FyfURyc3 VQJpnCWrHwLDpKVbyAQi+X4K9y9ZA/4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-186-EUfqs6b1N8SKnhm5ks2X_w-1; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:37:41 -0500 X-MC-Unique: EUfqs6b1N8SKnhm5ks2X_w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E016485B66E; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-114-166.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.166]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD03160C04; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:37:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Juraj =?utf-8?Q?Linke=C5=A1?= Cc: "thomas\@monjalon.net" , "david.marchand\@redhat.com" , "maicolgabriel\@hotmail.com" , "dev\@dpdk.org" , "Ruifeng.Wang\@arm.com" , "Honnappa.Nagarahalli\@arm.com" References: <1613554953-14736-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> <1613720062-19647-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:37:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: ("Juraj \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Linke\=C5\=A1\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:49:17 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: update arm64 Travis jobs to Graviton2 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Juraj Linke=C5=A1 writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Aaron Conole >> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 2:27 PM >> To: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 >> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; david.marchand@redhat.com; >> maicolgabriel@hotmail.com; dev@dpdk.org; Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com; >> Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ci: update arm64 Travis jobs to Graviton2 >>=20 >> Juraj Linke=C5=A1 writes: >>=20 >> > Instead of using the older platform, use only the newer Graviton2 >> > environment in Travis CI. >>=20 >> Can you expand on this a bit. Why should we need to use the newer >> environment? What problems will occur by using the older environment? >>=20 > > We're seeing intermittent issues with the environment. > > An example run https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds/21764106= 3 > > Issue 1: > collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] > > This suggest an issue with resources. > > Issue 2: > ticketlock_autotest sometimes times out. This could be due variable > resource availability in a container environment, but may not be. > > There could be other issues, I haven't analysed all of the logs, but > there are enough to make us want to switch to Graviton2 for all jobs. > > We're don't see either issue with the Graviton2 environment (which uses V= Ms). I guess it would be good to mention this motivation in the commit message - otherwise looking at the history we won't understand why we made this change. Please post v2 mentioning resource availability issues with travis-ci using the container infrastructure which don't seem to impact the VM infrastructure. I will ACK. >> I'm not against the change, but I don't understand it. >>=20 >> > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 >> > --- >>=20