From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01693A04A2; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:13:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1CB1BF0F; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:13:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C9F1BEF9 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:13:46 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2019 09:13:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,271,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="225168971" Received: from aburakov-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.92]) ([10.237.220.92]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2019 09:13:43 -0800 To: Rajesh Ravi Cc: Ajit Khaparde , dev@dpdk.org, Jonathan Richardson , Scott Branden , Vikram Mysore Prakash , Srinath Mannam References: <20191015053047.52260-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> <83009bb3-1e0c-a22e-eff8-41a437817cb7@intel.com> <64edebee-3686-beca-2b30-c6ec1f26c162@intel.com> <31bff5b7-169c-e158-3a87-6448272c571c@intel.com> <32f3cd1a-08bb-e4bc-c22c-53453b936dd3@intel.com> <3a954a3f-1fc5-47f0-64f2-a7c8e3fbf964@intel.com> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:13:42 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add option --iso-cmem for external custom memory X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 05-Nov-19 3:18 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > On 05-Nov-19 2:10 PM, Rajesh Ravi wrote: >> Thanks a lot Anatoly. >> Will the same solution work with  DPDK 19.02 as well? We 're actually >> using DPDK 19.02 for memory allocations for SPDK 19.07. >> DPDK 19.11 may not be supported by SPDK 19.07 we 're currently using. >> >> I 'll definitely test if the patch works with DPDK 19.02 >> >> Thanks again for your time and help. >> >> Regards, >> Rajesh > > Hi Rajesh, > > Please test the patch [1] and see if it works for you. The patch is not > intended for 19.02 (in fact, 19.02 is not even supported any more), but > it may still apply. In the meantime, i'm working on a different patch > for 18.11, that will achieve the same thing using different means. > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62468/ > The following is an alternative implementation that is based off 18.11: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62486/ -- Thanks, Anatoly