From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F1D3253;
 Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:15:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41])
 by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2017 04:15:38 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,377,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="126420259"
Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.134.81])
 ([10.255.134.81])
 by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2017 04:15:35 -0700
To: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, jingjing.wu@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
References: <1500276789-90626-1-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com>
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Message-ID: <f9bc65a5-788e-d1ad-a002-71b5ebd35443@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:15:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1500276789-90626-1-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix virtchnl message
 response timeout
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:15:40 -0000

On 7/17/2017 8:33 AM, Beilei Xing wrote:
> PF driver and VF driver communicated with each other by virtual
> channel message. When VF sends message to PF to enable some
> offload capability, PF should response if it is successful or not.
> VIRTCHNL_OP_ENABLE_VLAN_STRIPPING is a new added message and the
> old PF driver doesn’t support that. So no response is received by
> DPDK VF. Then VF is blocked on this message and cannot roll back.
> This patch clears pending command on VF side when the waiting duration
> expires to avoid blocking following communication.
> 
> Fixes: 5f0b95d59a98 ("net/i40e: support VLAN stripping for VF")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.