Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bus: clarify log for non-NUMA-aware devices

[Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>]

On 6/16/21 1:07 PM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> PCI and vmbus drivers printed a warning
> when NUMA node had beed reported as (-1) or not reported by OS:
> 
>      EAL:   Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0
> 
> This message and its level might confuse users, because configuration
> is valid and nothing happens that requires attention or intervention.
> 
> Reduce level to INFO, reword the message, and suppress it when there is
> only one NUMA node, bacause NUMA-awareness does not matter in this case.
> 
> Fixes: f0e0e86aa35d ("pci: move NUMA node check from scan to probe")
> Fixes: 831dba47bd36 ("bus/vmbus: add Hyper-V virtual bus support")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v2: Add NUMA node count check (Stephen Hemminger).
> 
>   doc/guides/nics/ena.rst          | 2 +-
>   drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c     | 4 ++--
>   drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c | 4 ++--
>   3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst b/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst
> index 0f1f63f722..694ce1da74 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ Example output:
>   
>      [...]
>      EAL: PCI device 0000:00:06.0 on NUMA socket -1
> -   EAL:   Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0
> +   EAL:   Device is not NUMA-aware, defaulting socket to 0
>      EAL:   probe driver: 1d0f:ec20 net_ena
>   
>      Interactive-mode selected
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> index 35d7d092d1..0bb56d9b7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> @@ -189,8 +189,8 @@ rte_pci_probe_one_driver(struct rte_pci_driver *dr,
>   		return 1;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (dev->device.numa_node < 0) {
> -		RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, "  Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0\n");
> +	if (rte_socket_count() > 1 && dev->device.numa_node < 0) {
> +		RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "  Device is not NUMA-aware, defaulting socket to 0\n");
>   		dev->device.numa_node = 0;

Is it intended side-effect of the patch that above assignment
is not done if node is negative and there is only one socket?

>   	}
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c b/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c
> index d25fd14ef5..5b654b0289 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c
> @@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ vmbus_probe_one_driver(struct rte_vmbus_driver *dr,
>   	/* reference driver structure */
>   	dev->driver = dr;
>   
> -	if (dev->device.numa_node < 0) {
> -		VMBUS_LOG(WARNING, "  Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0");
> +	if (rte_socket_count() > 1 && dev->device.numa_node < 0) {
> +		VMBUS_LOG(INFO, "  Device is not NUMA-aware, defaulting socket to 0\n");
>   		dev->device.numa_node = 0;

Same question here.

>   	}
>   
>