Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update qede PMD guide

[Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

On 11/22/2019 7:51 AM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
>  - Add note for Co-existence of DPDK and Linux drivers.
>  - Update the firmware version in example.
>  - Add Config note for potential error due to lack of memzone desciptor
>    count.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/nics/qede.rst | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/qede.rst b/doc/guides/nics/qede.rst
> index 2f4045795..9c14dd006 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/nics/qede.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/qede.rst
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ Co-existence considerations
>    to the PFs of a given adapter and either qede PMD or Linux drivers
>    (qed and qede) can be bound to the VFs of the adapter.
>  
> +- To use DPDK on some PFs and Linux drivers on other PFs of an adapter,
> +  create a VF each on the PFs where DPDK will be used, attach DPDK to
> +  these VFs and Linux drivers to the other PFs where no VFs are created.

But this won't be using DPDK on some PFs, you are indeed suggesting to create
VFs and use them via DPDK instead. And should the PF not bound to any kernel driver?