From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jia.guo@intel.com>
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5C61B1B7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:32:56 +0100 (CET)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 10 Jan 2018 01:32:55 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,339,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="22864919"
Received: from jguo15x-mobl3.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.67.68.70])
 ([10.67.68.70])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2018 01:32:52 -0800
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
References: <1509567405-27439-3-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com>
 <3539603.0DoXzmkF5E@xps>
 <01BA8470C017D6468C8290E4B9C5E1E83B2D1493@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <2285928.Pr9jqWPkcR@xps>
Cc: Mordechay Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 "stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
 "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
 "gaetan.rivet@6wind.com" <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>,
 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 "shreyansh.jain@nxp.com" <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>,
 "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>, "Zhang, Helin"
 <helin.zhang@intel.com>, "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
From: "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>
Message-ID: <fdfaca36-7859-8fa7-e4a6-cf2e164a0f21@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:32:51 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2285928.Pr9jqWPkcR@xps>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] eal: add uevent monitor for hot plug
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:32:56 -0000



On 1/9/2018 9:44 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 09/01/2018 13:08, Guo, Jia:
>> Your comments about split it totally make sense ,no doubt that, but my question is that if split api with the funcational , so the function part should be set null implement or stake. Any other good idea or tip for that.
> Yes when introducing the callback API first, there will be no
> implementation, so the callbacks are not called.
> If needed you can have some empty functions.
i think we all want to make review more effective in any good way, so 
the v9 patch set have been sent, please check.