From: "bai bakari" <912873551@qq.com>
To: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] The performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd?
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:49:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_20A51F1D094FBE360DEA0810102106CE0B07@qq.com> (raw)
Hi,
I test the performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd, and get the conclusion is:
l2fwd is three times better than test-pipeline, that confused me.
In principle it should be test-pipeline is better than l2fwd?
Anyone can tell me the reason, thank you in advance.
next reply other threads:[~2018-12-13 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-13 9:49 bai bakari [this message]
2018-12-13 18:15 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_20A51F1D094FBE360DEA0810102106CE0B07@qq.com \
--to=912873551@qq.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).